Skip to comments.
U.S. to request immunity for peacekeepers
Washington Times ^
| 6/18/02
| Betsy Pisik
Posted on 06/17/2002 11:15:59 PM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
NEW YORK
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: icc; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
06/17/2002 11:15:59 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte last month tried to have similar language added to an East Timor peacekeeping resolution and was swiftly rebuffed by French Ambassador Jean-David Levitte, who said it would go against the laws of France.Your UN kangaroo court goes against the laws of the United States, which is why we don't want to get buffaloed by it.
To: madfly
fyi
To: kattracks
I've got a better idea:
Why not make it clear that the US is not party to the ICC or to the World Court. If the UN doesn't like it, we should tell them to get out of the US, because we don't want to be part of them.
4
posted on
06/17/2002 11:34:02 PM PDT
by
rmlew
To: kattracks
Why not do the responsible and reasonable thing and refuse to participate in these peacekeeping endeavors? We need those guys on our borders anyhow.
5
posted on
06/17/2002 11:38:32 PM PDT
by
joeyman
To: rmlew
....there could be consequences if additional safeguards were not approved. "There could be ramifications for future peacekeeping missions, or the U.S. could pull out troops," the source said, adding that Congress could re-examine its 27 percent contribution to the U.N. peacekeeping budget.Best idea yet!
To: kattracks
I've got a better idea than "requesting" immunity. Why don't we just tell the EUnuchs that if they make any attempt to take a present or former US serviceman into custody, we'll see that as an act of war.
To: white trash redneck
My thoughts exactly.
To: rmlew
If the UN doesn't like it, we should tell them to get out of the US, because we don't want to be part of them. Politically, I long for two things: the day the last public school in the US closes its doors, and the day we withdraw from the UN! Those two things by themselves would eliminate a majority of the troubles we now experience.
9
posted on
06/18/2002 12:05:39 AM PDT
by
pariah
To: Travis McGee
It's long past due, too. I'd like to see this issue come to a head before Hillary gets the 'rat nomination for president.....
10
posted on
06/18/2002 12:23:15 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
If Hillary is ever president, there will be a hot civil war within the first term.
To: joeyman
Administration officials said yesterday that they were drafting a resolution that would formally exempt Americans, both soldiers and civilians, who are deployed overseas on U.N. peacekeeping missions.
I think that may be the point. We now can duck peacekeeping missions by pointing out that our soldiers can get tried by the UN for following UN orders.
To: kattracks
67 of the 180+ nations in the U.N. have ratified the treaty, yet it is going into affect? How does that frickin' happen?
13
posted on
06/18/2002 3:06:14 AM PDT
by
metesky
To: Travis McGee
Travis, I don't think she'd even be sworn in before hit the fan. FYI, many State legislatures open their yearly session with the question, "Shall we stay in the union", or something to that matter. I believe that in the event that, G_D forbid, she was elected it would be to maybe several, not more that 10, States. BTW, I'm all for leaving the UN. Peace
To: white trash redneck
"I've got a better idea than "requesting" immunity. Why don't we just tell the EUnuchs that if they make any attempt to take a present or former US serviceman into custody, we'll see that as an act of war." As I have previously said, the very instant any U.S. citizen is indicted or charged by this "court", a cruise missile should fly in through the window. So much for the International Court of "Justice".
--Boris
15
posted on
06/18/2002 6:47:53 AM PDT
by
boris
To: kattracks
Maybe the time has finally come to get us once and for all out of the U.N.
All it would take would be for a U.N. court to file charge against U.S. soldiers.
16
posted on
06/18/2002 7:12:23 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: kattracks
If are troops aren't granted immunity won't the DoD have to change the Oath that one takes when joining the military. Maybe someone out there can help me out--- "...defend the Constitution...obey the orders of commissioned officers both domestic and foreign.
To: Travis McGee
If Hillary is ever president, there will be a hot civil war within the first term.And Hillary would be the politition in Washington most likely to order that all the "domestic terrorists" who opposed her be rounded up and sent to "detention" camps.
To: white trash redneck
I've got a better idea than "requesting" immunity. Why don't we just tell the EUnuchs that if they make any attempt to take a present or former US serviceman into custody, we'll see that as an act of war.Exactly.
19
posted on
06/18/2002 9:49:42 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: white trash redneck
.....EUnuchs...... EUnuchs! BWAhahahaha!
20
posted on
06/18/2002 10:52:14 AM PDT
by
jadimov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson