We do not have in-fallible methods of measurement and all have been proven to be wrong to varying degrees. They also require constant environments or rely of known of today being applied to the past.
The point is that Old Earth/Macroevolution is not proven and there is evidence that may point to the Flood theory.
I did not however claim it scientifically as anything more than a theory which is more than I can say for your crowd.
Oh yeah, that scientists-trying-to-make-the-earth-older-than-it-really-is conspiracy. I keeping forgetting...
It is at best rather brusque and acerbic! And you were trying to question my 'lucidity.'
Well, i provided answers and proof to you....unless you want to say the information i sent you is false!
Now i await proof (and i mean proof not just mere faith) for your side of the story on the Earth being at least 6000years old (when evidence shows it is AT LEAST 4.5 billion years old, and that humans started appearing long before your 6000 year parameter!).
And please do not just state biblical verse...after all you DEMANDED proof for me. And if you start basing your proof on words written ages ago i may be forced tograb my copy of Grimms Fairy Tales and try to sell you on the existence of the Lil' Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf!
1. Opposing Views
2. Immanuel Velikovsky
3. But How can the Poles Shift
4. Charles Hapgood & James Bowles
5. Evidence of a Poleshift, Part I
6. Evidence of a Poleshift, Part II
Hey, since nobody brought this up, I thought I would throw in a couple of more monkey wrenches...second wrench...
concept...Noah's Flood was a Pole shift...
PS...
'Here's to ole' RPI,
her fame will never die,
here's to those olden daze,
here's to that golden haze,
here's to the friends we made...
at drearie ole' RPI'...