Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City's downside spelled out
Cincinnati Enquirer ^ | Friday, June 14, 2002 | Gregory Korte

Posted on 06/14/2002 6:23:01 AM PDT by day10

When it comes to economic development, Cincinnati has it all wrong, a Carnegie Mellon professor told 180 development professionals Thursday.

“Let me tell you what not to do: Build lots of stadiums and put out a brochure that says, "Cincinnati's back!'” said Richard Florida, author of The Rise of the Creative Class. “Because if you have to put out a glossy brochure to tell people that Cincinnati is cool, you're not.”

What Mr. Florida does recommend may be even more controversial, and could be summed up in a Washington Monthly headline over a review of his book: “Why cities without gays and rock bands are losing the economic development race.”

Why? Because a growing number of young, talented professionals are attracted not to high salaries, stock options and 401(k)s, but to cities that are diverse, vibrant and interesting.

“There is no example of a high-tech powerhouse in the world that does not first have a vibrant music scene,” he told a development conference at the University of Cincinnati, sponsored by the Greater Cincinnati Chamber of Commerce. “Everything in the United States that's something new is born in the garage.”

For evidence, Mr. Florida pointed to his “Bohemian Index” of the most culturally interesting cities. The top of that list — San Francisco; Austin, Texas; San Diego; Boston; and Seattle — are also high-tech meccas.

And, he said, they're “some of the gayest cities in the United States.”

Out of the 49 largest U.S. cities, Cincinnati ranks 33rd on the Bohemian Index.

“You guys slack off real bad on the gay index,” he said. “You've got to work on the diversity piece. You have to have an environment where new people are almost immediately grabbed and accepted.”

In focus group interviews, young professionals say they often ask companies recruiting them whether they offer domestic-partner benefits — and not because they're gay. To them, tolerance for homosexuals translates into a more accepting workplace overall, Mr. Florida said.

Repealing Article 12, the Cincinnati charter amendment which outlaws “preferential treatment” for gays and lesbians, is essential, he said.

Still, culture alone does not breed success. “Miami and New Orleans, which are great lifestyle places, couldn't invent a piece of technology to save themselves,” he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asinine; cincinnati; economicdevelopemnt
This is so asinine I can't even begin to comment..........
1 posted on 06/14/2002 6:23:01 AM PDT by day10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f;snopercod;mommadooo3;brityank;JeanS
"Let me tell you what not to do: Build lots of stadiums and put out a brochure that says, "Cincinnati's back!'"

To paraphrase and apply elsewhere:

"Let me tell you what not to do: Build lots of federal departmentia and put out a brochure that says, "Security's back!'"

2 posted on 06/14/2002 6:31:44 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

Mr. Florida.

3 posted on 06/14/2002 6:32:46 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10
Wasn't there some recent news item about some guy somewhere, maybe in Seattle, talking about building a "boutique hospital?"
4 posted on 06/14/2002 6:33:11 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10
What about black looters and rioters? Are they included in Mr. Florida's diversity plan?
5 posted on 06/14/2002 7:23:22 AM PDT by bulldawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10;First_Salute
What he's saying in a roundabout way is that queers have more money than normal folks. (because they don't have children to support)
6 posted on 06/14/2002 8:39:09 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch;joanie-f;snopercod
I once had the pleasure of listening to various "higher-ups" in conservativism who were of the mind that no conservative media effort can sell without the creativity of the artist class, you may say. These esteemed misers of their republican power were certain to not invest in new efforts without first firing the people who were trying to build a newspaper, so to speak, and replacing the outcast with gay minds, also so to speak.

The most high admitted their weakness --- that is, their inability to imagine --- and thus, they sought it; but they also could not imagine that imagination could possibly come from another conservative, democratic-republican.

It was stifling, listening to expressions of who these men and women are, with their limited, admitted imaginations ... not giving credit to other than their own images.

Is howcome we do not have much of the media territory across the land.

7 posted on 06/14/2002 9:09:31 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson