Skip to comments.
Education board considers alternate theories about life
The Indepedent ^
| 6/7/2002
Posted on 06/13/2002 7:48:51 AM PDT by JediGirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: balrog666
21
posted on
06/13/2002 9:14:03 AM PDT
by
steve-b
To: PatrickHenry
Glad I live far from Nebraska.
22
posted on
06/13/2002 9:18:27 AM PDT
by
stanz
To: JediGirl
Ecclesastes 12:
The Conclusion of the Matter
9 Not only was the Teacher wise, but also he imparted knowledge to the people. He pondered and searched out and set in order many proverbs. 10 The Teacher searched to find just the right words, and what he wrote was upright and true.
11 The words of the wise are like goads, their collected sayings like firmly embedded nails-given by one Shepherd. 12 Be warned, my son, of anything in addition to them.
Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.
13 Now all has been heard;
here is the conclusion of the matter:
Fear God and keep his commandments,
for this is the whole duty of man.
14 For God will bring every deed into judgment,
including every hidden thing,
whether it is good or evil.
To: JediGirl
Math and reading standards have already been added to the rule.Alternate theories now required to be taught in Nebraska include the theory that "reading is so totally lame" and "math is boring and sucks".
To: Physicist
"math is boring and sucks".We don't need to teach what is common knowledge.
To: Physicist
In 1897 the Indiana House of Representatives unanimously passed a measure redefining the area of a circle and the value of pi. (House Bill no. 246, introduced by Rep. Taylor I. Record.) The bill died in the state Senate.
Note: This is not the internet hoax about Arkansas. See here, or here. As the latter link makes obvious, when dealing in politics, cherchez l'argent.
26
posted on
06/13/2002 9:57:59 AM PDT
by
Gumlegs
To: Dimensio
Oh goodie! So we can all admit that proving something that exists beyond space-time is not possible, and renounce our atheism and theism respectively. Let's all hold hands and admit that we are now agnostics. A little intellectual honesty is all I ask folks.
To: jlogajan
every whackjob god myth is false
That's a non-sequitur jlogajan. As a free thinker, I'm sure you already knew that.
To: That Subliminal Kid
Oh goodie! So we can all admit that proving something that exists beyond space-time is not possible, and renounce our atheism and theism respectively.
So this "God" thing exists beyond space-time? Why is something that exists beyond space-time undetectable? Why should I even consider a proposal if no evidence for its validity can be presented?
If I cannot objectively observe this "god", then why should I give it any more credence than invisible intangible purple unicorns creating the universe?
29
posted on
06/13/2002 10:44:26 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
To: JediGirl
The existence of a deity is irrelevant in science
Ding ding ding! We have a winner. Makes you wonder why so many atheists pretend that science supports or in some way leads to atheism.
To: Dimensio
You shouldn't. Everything that exists just happened through a long series of amazingly remote chances in exactly the right order. Move along..
To: Dimensio
By the way, can you objectively observe an emotional state? Can you think of any other things which you assume exist but cannot objectively observe? Think hard. There'll be a pop-quiz on this tomorrow.
To: That Subliminal Kid
Makes you wonder why so many atheists pretend that science supports or in some way leads to atheism. Nice case of projection! It is the creationists that say that Darwin leads to atheism.
33
posted on
06/13/2002 10:48:59 AM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
Darwin? Ever heard of theistic evolution? By the way, what on earth is a "Creationist"? I see that term blithely tossed about so often (by you) that I'm really unsure what exactly you mean when you use the word. Mind giving me a concrete definition that I can hold you to? Thanks!
To: That Subliminal Kid
By the way, can you objectively observe an emotional state?
I can't...It is possible to monitor the chemical state of the human brain and observe changes based on "emotional state", but I personally posess neither the equipment nor the expertise to make such observations.
35
posted on
06/13/2002 10:58:59 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
To: That Subliminal Kid
Everything that exists just happened through a long series of amazingly remote chances in exactly the right order.
Really? I've not seen the chain of events that led to "everything that exists" at this moment, so I can't draw such a conclusion.
36
posted on
06/13/2002 10:59:55 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
To: That Subliminal Kid
Let's all hold hands and admit that we are now agnosticsThat is exactly what I am! :-)
To: RadioAstronomer
Placemarker from beyond space and time.
To: JediGirl
How clever, you switched the name of God with Allah. I would have thought you'd pick "The Force".
39
posted on
06/13/2002 12:47:00 PM PDT
by
avenir
To: jlogajan
Thanks for the smile.
40
posted on
06/13/2002 12:51:52 PM PDT
by
avenir
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson