Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
But his arrest was supposedly predicated on those he associated with. Now they are saying he won't tell them who his associates were.

You don't see a difference between me knowing who you have associated with and you not telling me who you associated with ? Its like me having witnesses that you robbed a bank and you saying "What bank ? "

149 posted on 06/11/2002 2:07:13 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
You don't see a difference between me knowing who you have associated with and you not telling me who you associated with ?

Not when the government comes out and plainly states that they do not. If I can paraphrase accurately Wolfowitz says: "Clearly he has associates, but he won't tell us who they are."

If they had any credible information whatsoever, they wouldn't need his cooperation to build a case. Furthermore the constitution protects his right to refrain from cooperating. It is absurd to suggest that one accused of a crime (and in this case he isn't even charged with a crime) must cooperate with the authorities or be assumed guilty. That turns our alleged justice system on its ear.

155 posted on 06/11/2002 3:47:44 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson