Not when the government comes out and plainly states that they do not. If I can paraphrase accurately Wolfowitz says: "Clearly he has associates, but he won't tell us who they are."
If they had any credible information whatsoever, they wouldn't need his cooperation to build a case. Furthermore the constitution protects his right to refrain from cooperating. It is absurd to suggest that one accused of a crime (and in this case he isn't even charged with a crime) must cooperate with the authorities or be assumed guilty. That turns our alleged justice system on its ear.
Using your understanding then he is lying in the first part of his statement.
Let me see if I udnerstand you correctly. The fed's were just sitting around and decided to put a whole bunch of names in a hat and chose one to arrest and detain indefinately. Kind of like a lottery.
That is a very interesting point of view. I will support your right to it.