Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PEELER, SANFORD LEAD THE PACK FOR NOMINATION
The Post & Courier ^ | June 9, 2002 | SCHUYLER KROPF

Posted on 06/10/2002 1:59:41 PM PDT by Big Steve

PEELER, SANFORD LEAD THE PACK FOR NOMINATION

Sunday, June 9, 2002

BY SCHUYLER KROPF
Of The Post and Courier Staff


     With only days and hours to go, the Republican fight for governor appears to have narrowed: It's Bob Peeler versus Mark Sanford.
     A Post and Courier poll of 404 likely Republican primary voters shows the two hopefuls emerging as the strong 1-2 choices going into Tuesday's primary. If the trend holds, Peeler, 50, the current lieutenant governor from Lexington, and Sanford, 42, the ex-congressman from Charleston, would be in line to face off again in two weeks for the right to take on Democratic Gov. Jim Hodges in November.
     Under South Carolina election law, if no candidate in a multi-person field collects more than 50 percent of the vote, a run-off is automatically ordered.
     It would be held Tuesday, June 25.
     Peeler is backed by 39 percent of state Republican primary voters, according to the poll, while Sanford is second with 26 percent.
     Attorney General Charlie Condon is a distant third with 15 percent. The other four candidates trail far behind in low single digits.
     Brad Coker of Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., said Peeler has done the best at solidifying GOP support statewide, but he's also drawing_deep backing from the conservative Upstate - a huge prize where most of the Republican primary turnout is located.
     "Peeler in the Upstate is beating Sanford 5-to-1, and he's beating Condon 3-to-1," Coker said. "He might even get close to 50 percent, given that the 11 percent (undecided) is still out there."
     Peeler has stayed virtually tied with Sanford in the Republican Midlands, Coker said, but Sanford is winning among voters on the coast, the site of his old 1st Congressional District. That could be his ticket to making the runoff, although turnout also will be a factor. Party leaders expect a minimum of 300,000 voters.
     "Sanford has done a pretty good effort at putting together a first-time statewide campaign," Coker said. "The Charleston area vote may be enough to secure him second place."
     Most political watchers expected the GOP governor's battle would go to a runoff. The surprising thing, Coker said, is that Sanford has emerged as the choice over Condon, who had enjoyed a wide degree of statewide name identification after eight years as attorney general and as Charleston County's lead prosecutor before that.
     But Coker also said Condon - who is known for seeking publicity and a bare-knuckle style of politics - carries a lot of negative baggage. That's reflected in Republican responses. "He's obviously stepped on a few toes over the years," Coker said.
     Of all the candidates, Condon had the highest percentage of unfavorable name recognition - and the only double-digit unfavorables in the poll - at 17 percent. Peeler was rated unfavorably by 9 percent of Republican voters, while Sanford's unfavorable ratings were a low 3 percent - despite several attempts by opponents and Democrats to embarrass the candidate.
     The poll is based on telephone interviews taken Monday-Wednesday with 404 voters who regularly take part in Republican primaries. The margin of error is plus or minus 5 percentage points, meaning the results present a 95 percent "true" picture.
     And while all the campaigns will be out today trying to shore up their support, a second poll done by the newspaper shows Hodges would be in trouble against either Peeler or Sanford in a hypothetical November general election match-up.
     That poll of 500 likely general election voters taken during the same time period shows Hodges leading Peeler 45-44 percent and leading Sanford 44-42 percent. But since both sets of numbers are within the poll's 4.5-point margin of error, the races are statistical toss-ups.
     Pollster Coker said the numbers don't bode well for a sitting incumbent governor. "If they had the election tomorrow, Hodges would be hard-pressed to beat either one of these guys," he said.
     Hodges is in the same position as former Republican Gov. David Beasley was four years ago, Coker said, explaining that incumbents usually poll around what they are going to get in the general election, because that reflects their base.
     "The undecided voters break for the challenger," he said. In this case, that's in favor of the undetermined GOP nominee. "It's a clear sign that he's vulnerable. He's in trouble."
     "It's possible in the end he could be re-elected, but it's not a slam dunk," Coker said.
     Hodges' best hope against the top three Republicans would be to face Condon in November, the poll found. The Democratic governor holds a commanding 51-36 percent lead vs. the attorney general in their hypothetical match-up.
     "That doesn't look like it's going to happen," Coker said.
     The other Republicans in the seven-way field - and their percent of support found in the poll - are: Secretary of State Jim Miles, 4 percent; Columbia tax lawyer Ken Wingate, 2 percent; nuclear lab technician Reb Sutherland, 2 percent; Summerville Sen. Bill Branton, 1 percent.
    
    


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: peeler; sanford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Feel free to post with comments.
1 posted on 06/10/2002 1:59:42 PM PDT by Big Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: all


What? You haven't contributed to Free Republic yet?

Did you know Free Republic is funded solely by us?

Don't wait until it too late! Do you part, contribute if you can,

or bump the fundraising thread.

A Tribute to Freepers - Summer Freepathon! Thread 2

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

2 posted on 06/10/2002 2:12:11 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
BUMP to keep this thread going.
3 posted on 06/10/2002 2:13:26 PM PDT by Big Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
Is Mark Sanford Fred's other son? I wonder if Lamont will get behind his brother?
4 posted on 06/10/2002 2:26:05 PM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
Thanks for the post. I don't entirely trust the polling data. IMO, Sanford is stronger in the upstate than indicated in the poll. At the debate at Bob Jones, Peeler got the least applause.
5 posted on 06/10/2002 2:32:45 PM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Mark Sanford was my congressman for 6 years. He kept his term limit promise. He voted aginast pork projects for our district and other districts. He is a man of great integrity. I will vote for him on Tuesday 6/11, but really wish he would run against Hollings when his jig, er, term is up.
6 posted on 06/10/2002 3:00:37 PM PDT by feedback doctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
The South Carolina Heritage Coalition has been running ads hot and heavy on radio here in Columbia, savaging Sanford's voting record--"Mark Sanford voted with Bill Clinton more than any other South Carolina Republican." Apparently he wasn't for keeping the Confederate Naval Jack up on the dome.

All I know is that I'll be glad when the primaries are over, the ads are overwhelming and obnoxious. Especially the Stan Spears for Adjutant General ad. Joe Wilson's a great guy, but he does the worst radio ad read in history. :)

}:-)4

7 posted on 06/10/2002 3:02:28 PM PDT by Moose4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
Sanford was also my COngressman. He kept his term limits pledge as indicated. Either Peeler or Sanford will have a good shot at defeating Hodges. Hodges has lower poll numbersthan David Beasley did 4 years ago.
8 posted on 06/10/2002 3:33:05 PM PDT by Big Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
I still can't figure out why Carroll Campbell didn't dispatch of Hollings in 1998. From what I recall, he was ahead of him in polls.
9 posted on 06/10/2002 3:35:35 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
This poll was based on 404 SC voters? This is representative of ALL of South Carolina? geez.
10 posted on 06/10/2002 5:05:18 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Sanford has been endorsed by Lindsay Graham and John McCain. John McCain is currently in bed with the anti-gun crowd...makes you wonder why he would endorse Sanders.
11 posted on 06/10/2002 5:08:15 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve; CWRWinger; feedback doctor; Moose4; DrNo
Why would McCain endorse Sanford? You have to ask yourself what is it about Sanford that would cause someone like McCain to endorse Sanford.
12 posted on 06/10/2002 5:20:33 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
A Post and Courier poll of 404 likely Republican primary voter

Not much of a poll.

13 posted on 06/10/2002 6:33:31 PM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Most of those ads regarding Sanford votng for Bill Clinton's 93 tax increase are TOTALLY INCORRECT! Sanford got elected in 1994, so how could he vote for Clinton's tax increase? If you look at his voting record, it was one of the most conservate in congress.

He was my congressman in Charleston, but now I live in the upstate. He doesn't have the name recognition up here, but hopefully if he gets in the runoff that will change.

14 posted on 06/10/2002 6:43:58 PM PDT by Babsig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Campell did't run against Hollings in 1998. It was Bob Ingles, a congressman from upstate SC. BTW, Carroll Campbell has Alzheimer's Disease. His two sons had a press conference last week in Greenville endorsing Sanford.
15 posted on 06/10/2002 6:50:55 PM PDT by Babsig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
I'm voting for Condon and I know plenty of people who plan to vote that way.
16 posted on 06/10/2002 8:36:01 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Babsig
I didn't say that Campbell did run; I said he was considering it, and polls showed he would have been a very strong challenger.

Was the Alzheimer's the reason he decided against a run in 1998?

17 posted on 06/11/2002 3:52:46 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I, also, am voting for Condon. He is pro-Southern and very conservative. Overall, he has been very consistent. Is he perfect? No. But he has a good record. He stood against video poker and the lottery in SC. He stood up to the naacp. He knows what is not good for this state.

I like his bold statements to end all property tax in SC. It's ludicruous for us to have to rent our property from the government.

Mr. Condon as AG, knows who the enemies of our state are. This knowledge will help Mr. Condon as Governor.

18 posted on 06/11/2002 4:38:14 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Good luck all. Let's get out there and vote.

Unless for some reason a voter couldn't legally vote at the time of a primary, I don't want to hear any complaints about a persons voter registration being messed up. Voting in a primary is one of the best ways to find out before a general election if your registration is OK and you're voting at the correct precinct.

19 posted on 06/11/2002 5:06:15 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve
Wish I had seen this sooner but anyway here is my two cents worth.I dont believe Charlie Condon can win because law enforcement will go hard against him.He has tried awfully hard to put some police officers in jail is the rumor I hear.Plus in a case I was involved in a representative in his office would not give me as an individual on a governing body an opinion on a issue that I requested.The issue was over the legality of something that was going on and the body was benefiting personally from it.Myself and one other elected member disagreed.This is a bigger problem than most people realize but apparently an elected body can pass anything it wishes regardless of the law and the A/Gs office wont stand against it unless the whole body request.The reason I said this is I was told to get the whole body to request it while they were willing to pass it and they would not agree to ask for opinion.So this indicates to me how our elected officials get away with so much,citizens do not appear to have anyone representing them against their own government.I guess as a citizen you must hire personal council to take on city hall even if what they are doing is questionable.I think Peeler and Sanford would make the best Govenors but dont really know enough about Peeler.I think a lot of Mark Sanford because of his promise to not stay in Washington,DC and keeping it.Plus I really think he wants to get rid of some of our over bloated government and I believe he is a man of his word.I know a lot of rumors have been circulating about Sanfords voting record while in Washington and I also know most of it is lies and for some in here need I remind you as much as I despised Clinton he did do some things I agreed with and lets not hold a Conservative responsible with voting with Clinton when we agreed with the issue.The only issue I have with Mark Sanford is over a couple of donations he got while in Conress from real a strong Democrat now who was fighting David Beasley around the time but I think I may understand what was going on so this will not sway me one way or the other at present.As far as Peeler I have no real knowledge good or bad about him.All I have gleaned about him comes from the news and friends in the upstate and it sounds good.I think Republicans would have a winner with Sanford or Peeler from my personal standpoint.
20 posted on 06/11/2002 5:49:45 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson