[wtc911]

Not my job. It's out there if you really want to find it. Try a search using "massacres, India". Keep digging. You might even find the pictures of the Indian women who were raped, then murdered, then incinerated because they were Muslims and not fast enough to get away. And, please don't give me any Islam vs. the world, they must have done something to ask for it nonsense. Or insinuate thast I am soft on Islam, not unless you lost more friends on 9.11 than I did.

India, now, is our ally. In the 80's they were not. When this is all over, who knows....The fact is that to millions of people living there they are to be feared for what they have shown they can do.

[mikeIII]

If you make wild, exaggerated statements, you should have the ability, if not the courtesy ("not my job"), to substantiate them. And trying to intimidate me on what I might have wanted to say isn't much good either! Soft on Islam? You said it, not I!

[Aaron_A]

'massacres america' yields 3x the hits as 'massacres india'. 'massacres israel' is ~2.5x, 'massacres britain' is a tad more, 'massacres afghanistan' is the same, 'massacres france' is more than 3x....so wtf is your point?

[TigerTale]

I agree with mikeIII here, wtc911. If you make a statement for which you claim publicly available evidence exists, it is your job to provide such evidence. This is called the "burden of proof" and it is essential to constructive debate. Expecting others to research evidence for a claim you have adopted is discourteous at best and disingenuous at worst.

If you want your statements about India to be taken seriously, I respectfully request that you post links to the evidence you have referenced. If you don't care whether or not your statements are taken seriously, I ask--again with respect--why you have posted them on a serious forum.