[Tai_Chung]

National Enquirer?

[codebreaker]

You bet, their reporters have been on a roll lately, ask Jesse Jackson and Rodger Clinton.

[Clara Lou]

Occasionally the Enquirer gets one right. We'll see. I hope they are. Condit is despicable, whether he was in on Chandra's murder, or not.

[M. Peach]

National Enquirer? When they were the first ones to get the blue dress story right after Clinton lied aabout it - Jay Leno asked, "When did you think the day would come when people would start believing the National Enquirer over the president?

[Revolting cat!]

The posts that say nothing but "National Enquirer?" as if that all by itself was loaded with more meaning than the Iliad and the Odyssey, are so lame, lame and so 9-10. That is 9-10-1992. Can't you guys find something more original to say? Where have you been where the NE covered the OJ story, the Monica story and others, while Newspeak and the two Pravdas - the one on the Hudson and the one on the Potomac - were sitting the stories out, delaying, censoring. Let's move on beyond these predictable kneejerk reactions, shall we?!