Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bill Michael, who coordinated terrorism cases at the U.S. attorney's office in Minneapolis until 2000, said he doubted the evidence would have been enough to obtain a criminal warrant, but that it should have been enough for a FISA warrant.

Indeed, it should have.

And now we know who the kludge was, this Michael Maltbie. This guy is toast.

1 posted on 06/06/2002 2:02:00 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross
I'm more inclined to blame the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and the rest of the media for 20 years of sniviling about the size/scope of the FBI/CIA/NSA.
2 posted on 06/06/2002 2:08:02 PM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
I heard a prominent (well-respected) legal expert on the radio a couple of weeks ago who made the exact opposite point -- he said that in this particular case it would have been much harder to obtain an FISA warrant than a criminal warrant.
3 posted on 06/06/2002 2:18:29 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
After watching her testimony, God help us if she is one of the top agents.
4 posted on 06/06/2002 2:19:02 PM PDT by miamimark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
"The French would have done it without blinking," Revell said. "They don't require warrants for their national security activities."

The French also have no qualms about sending agents to a foreign country to engage in acts of terrorism against a third party. I'm not sure we should be using tham as a standard for anything.

5 posted on 06/06/2002 2:20:22 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
What was on Moussaoui's computer?
10 posted on 06/06/2002 2:26:34 PM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
The other day Maureen Dowd predictably wrote a woman smart/men dumb column, contrasting the brilliant Rowley with the dumb-ass good-old-boys club. This article makes it clear that there was far more to it than that, that there were LAWS whose criteria had to be met in order to gain a warrant, and it was not at all clear that the FBI had sufficient evidence to obtain a warrant. The position vacancies - not mentioned in any other reports I have seen - were apparently also a major factor in the intelligence not getting more attention.
19 posted on 06/06/2002 2:34:17 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
Coulda, woulda, shoulda.

This is worthless. Just set things up correctly going forward. All the analysing is a waste of time.

61 posted on 06/06/2002 3:20:45 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
bump
99 posted on 06/06/2002 9:55:27 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross
This is pathetic. Anyone know where Michael Maltbie is. Compare this pathetic response with FBI actions at Ruby Ridge and Waco where killing innocent US citizens for reasons of "political incorrectness" was the agenda. Heaven help us!!
104 posted on 06/07/2002 7:29:40 AM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson