Posted on 06/04/2002 5:44:13 PM PDT by anymouse
PRAGUE (Reuters) - A leading Czech official has once again insisted that Mohammed Atta, one of the suspected hijackers involved in the September 11 attacks on the United States, met an Iraqi agent in Prague just months before crashing a plane into the World Trade Center.
The weekly Prague Post was to report in its June 5 edition that Hynek Kmonicek, Czech envoy to the United Nations, had affirmed that a disputed meeting between Atta and Iraqi agent Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani took place in April 2001.
The meeting, which several Czech officials have claimed took place and U.S. intelligence agencies recently cast doubt upon, would be the only piece of evidence linking Iraq with the September 11 attacks.
"The meeting took place," the paper quotes Kmonicek as saying during an interview in New York.
Atta was an Egyptian suspected of flying one of the two planes into New York's World Trade Center.
The Prague Post, an English-language weekly, added in a statement that Kmonicek had said he personally ordered the expulsion of al-Ani from the Czech Republic in April 2001.
The agent, listed as second consul at the Iraqi embassy in Prague, was under surveillance by Czech intelligence authorities and subsequently expelled for "engaging in activities beyond his diplomatic duties," a phrase usually taken to mean spying.
Revelations of Atta's Prague connection first surfaced one month after the attacks when Czech Interior Minister Stanislav Gross said Atta had met al-Ani in Prague in April 2001.
He said officials knew of only two visits by Atta, who once lived in neighboring Germany. The other occurred while Atta was in transit at the airport in the spring of 2000.
No hard evidence has emerged linking Iraq to the attacks on the United States, and Iraqi officials have denied any involvement in the plot or in the deadly release of anthrax bacteria in the United States.
They have accused Washington of fabricating the anthrax attacks as a pretext to broaden its anti-terrorism campaign to include more countries.
The United States has named Saudi-born Osama bin Laden as its chief suspect in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. No link between the attacks and the anthrax incidents has been established.
Time to reconnect the dots.
UN envoy confirms terrorist meeting - Kmonicek says Al-Ani, Atta spoke in Prague (Prague Post)
The Czech envoy to the UN has confirmed that an Iraqi agent met with suspected Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta, in the latest rebuke to widespread U.S. media reports dismissing the Prague encounter as a fabrication."The meeting took place," Hynek Kmonicek, a former deputy foreign minister, told The Prague Post flatly in a New York City interview.
Czech Interior Minister Stanislav Gross announced last fall that Atta and Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, a second consul at the Iraqi Embassy in Prague, had conversed at least once, in April 2001. Gross would not rule out other encounters.
The controversial meeting became known as "the Prague connection" and was mentioned frequently as a possible pretext for renewed hostilities between the United States and Iraq.
Al-Ani was expelled from the Czech Republic April 22, 2001 -- less than a month after the conversation -- for "engaging in activities beyond his diplomatic duties," a phrase usually reserved for allegations of spying or terrorist-related activities.
Kmonicek, the Czech Republic's UN envoy since October, is the most senior government official to openly confirm the encounter since unnamed U.S. intelligence officials began challenging it in anonymous comments reported last month by Newsweek magazine, The Washington Post and The New York Times.
Kmonicek, considered a Middle East expert, once directed the Middle East department of the Foreign Ministry.
In the interview, Kmonicek said he ordered al-Ani's expulsion after failing to receive answers from the Iraqi chief of mission regarding al-Ani's role in Prague.
"He didn't know [what al-Ani was up to]," Kmonicek said. "He just didn't know."
Kmonicek refused to label al-Ani a spy, however.
Last fall, international media widely reported that Atta, a 33-year-old Egyptian who allegedly piloted one of the hijacked Sept. 11 jetliners, and al-Ani had spoken in Prague -- though the subject of their meetings was never positively revealed.
The rendezvous between the al-Qaida operative and the Iraqi intelligence agent was confirmed by Prime Minister Milos Zeman, who told CNN in October that the two men were scheming to destroy the headquarters of U.S.-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
Zeman later backtracked, saying he was describing only one possible scenario.
In recent weeks, unnamed U.S. law enforcement and intelligence sources have been quoted as saying the Czechs may have made up the encounter or at the very least confused the dates.
Although Atta flew from Prague to the United States in June 2000, the sources said that the Czech intelligence apparatus, the Security Information Service (BIS), had failed to convince them Atta and al-Ani ever came face to face.
The Newsweek report hinted that the Czech government might actually have retracted the allegation and apologized to the United States for making the error.
But Kmonicek, a government official with top security clearance, was adamant that al-Ani and Atta met in April 2001, as Czech officials have stated repeatedly.
"At the time [of the meeting] I was in Prague," he said. "It's not like they [the Czech government] sent me a cable saying, 'Say this because you are our ambassador.' It's not like that. I was the person who had to [expel] al-Ani."
Last October, in an interview with The Times of London, Kmonicek raised alarm bells about the possible significance of the meeting. "It is not a common thing for an Iraqi diplomat to meet a student from a neighboring country," he said. He made similar remarks to Newsweek, which apparently did not seek him out when it reported the recent U.S. rebuttals.
Atta was an architecture student and draftsman in Hamburg, Germany, during the 1990s. He is believed to have visited Prague at least twice in 2000 and 2001.
One senior Czech official familiar with details of the Atta/al-Ani matter and who requested anonymity speculated that the media reports dismissing the meeting were the result of a "guided leak."
This source said officials determined to influence President George W. Bush away from entering into renewed conflict with Iraq could have provided such a leak.
The Prague meeting has been mentioned as a possible smoking gun directly linking Baghdad with the Sept. 11 attacks, though Bush said as recently as May 28 that the U.S. had no immediate plans to strike at Iraq.
Kmonicek said the Czech government collected detailed evidence of the al-Ani/Atta meeting, but declined to elaborate on the nature of the evidence.
At the same time, Kmonicek dismissed recent news agency reports that al-Qaida and members of Afghanistan's deposed Taliban regime had regrouped in Eastern Europe, including the Czech Republic.
"The Interior Ministry opened an investigation and found nothing," he said.
Kmonicek was unhappy at recent characterizations of the Czech Republic as a terrorist hub.
"If I wanted to set up an Arab spy network, I would go to Queens," he said, referring to a borough of New York City with a sizable Middle Eastern population.
Prague, he said, has a small-town feel where "everybody knows everybody" and Arabs don't blend in the way they might in Queens.
Frank Griffiths may be reached at news@praguepost.com (June 5, 2002)
I believe the Czechs. There is some kind of disinfo/distraction game going on.
Thanks for reminding me of Atta's link to the first anthrax victim...I need to remember all the whys and wherefores of how come I'm so angry and ready for war with the Devil.
Dear Reuters: How about "Atta was one of several terrorists who hijacked a plane and flew it into the World Trade Center".
What was your first clue?
Seriously, the Czechs have no axe to grind. Quite unlike the Egyptians with their claim to have alerted the CIA last year.
The Czechs also have a history of outstanding intelligence work, one that pre-dates the Russian occupation and WW II.
The Czechs are no fools. And I gather they are somewhat offended by Western media notions that they might have made a "mistake"...
Atta met with al-Ani. Several times. We can safely assume that is a statement of fact.
So, what did they talk about? The price of hummus in Baghdad...???
How we "resolve" the current-multiple-threats to our Civilization will be of interest to future Historians; the "moves" & "Values" of our current "Leaders" will FOREVER be "Judged" by how well our Civilization survives the Barbaric Attacks we must Endure.
The "Barbarians" can ONLY "Hurt Us" IF They scare us into abandoning our Basic Rights!!
IF we are NOW, "AT WAR," we have EVERY RIGHT to "Devolve Our Enemies" back to " Stone-Age" existence!
WE are our Species "BEST HOPE FOR SURVIVAL!!!"
Doc
Yet another Czech official going on record in his own name to affirm the story. There are at least three now, including Minister of the Interior Stanislav Gross.
On the other side, the people saying the meeting did not take place have never been named. I don't imagine they will ever be named.
Yes, I agree, Dubya was as direct as a CINC can be when speaking of future action.
All the hyenas are howling that we don't announce a date and time certain for our strike, forgetting that he said we'll do it when we choose, how we choose.
I'm a thinkin' history is gonna be made real soon. November sounds good, but the bad guys can do a lot of prepositioning in the next six months.
But, then, so can we.
What is going on? People are being quoted all over the place linking various terrorist attacks, against the US, with Iraq etc, and vague news reports and statements are being made by US governement spokesmen which downplay any links. At the same time Bush states that Iran, Iraq, Syria, N Korea, Cuba etc. are all part of an axis of evil, without giving any specific reasons why.
I think Bush has already decided what to do, and what we are now seeing is news and expectation management. When the time is right, and that means when the US and allied military is ready, and when vital alliances, (for example with the Russians), have been cemented, military action will be taken.
I think Bush is keeping his powder dry. When he is ready, I think you will find that he has suddenly "discovered" concrete links between the recent terrorist attack at the WTC, and in Oklahoma City; and terrorist sponsors Iraq, Iran, and Syria. I believe that military action will be taken against all three, Iran, Iraq, and Syria.
By the way, I am amazed at how the anthrax attacks have been portrayed. Anyone who has seen the letters and envelopes should realise that they were not written by an educated US citizen. No demands were made, so what point was an alleged disgruntled US citizen trying to make. The anthrax could only have been made with the use of expensive refining equipment. The Islamic references point to an Islamic source.. The timing, with the envelopes being posted at almost the same time as 911 are too much of a coincidence. Some people have tried to explain all this away as just a disinformation attempt. On the contrary, I think the mental gymnastics involved in not taking the evidence at face value point to a deliberate attempt by the powers that be to suppress the logical conclusion until it becomes more convenient.
Well, fancy that!
Yes, the "unnamed" government sources have been busy planting disinformation. The media is responsible for the reliability of the information they print on the basis of "unnamed" sources. Reporters who pass on "disinformation" or any information that later turns out to be falsehoods deliberately planted to mislead the public should be fired and their so-called sources revealed to other journalists. Using a reporter to deliberately plant a lie in the media should be enough to break the non-disclosure agreement between the media and sources. Closing the direct pipeline to the public for disinformation campaigns is the job of the media. Only having the names of these "sources" printed will deter government agents from deliberately lying to the public to cover up misdeeds. Since the media seem unable to undertand this, most sensible people don't believe much of what is printed on the basis of "unnamed" sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.