And your definition of a "true conservative" is someone who thinks that the question of whether human activity is increasing global warming is a Constitutional question, not a scientific question?
And your comment overlooks the history of the world..y'know...the world that had Ice Ages and warming periods LONG BEFORE humans could have been affecting weather and climate! Remember that world?
Recent info says the Sun is moving into a more active period, and some scientists claim it is burning Helium. It IS a possibility, that the Sun goes thru cycles and burns layers. If so, that alone would warm the Earth...which BTW, the Earth still is recovering from the LAST ICE AGE!
Remember the reports in the late 70's-early 80's of the coming ICE AGE?
Care to average the temps over the last 1000 years?
Didn't think so....
Just another nail in the coffin (if report is true) for GW in my books. If this is so, I'll vote for the one from now on who will give ME more...why let the leftists get all MY hard-earned money. Since it seems Republicans are looking to give my money away to others, I might as well learn to vote to get as much as I can now!
However, even if human activity is having little or no effect on global warming, but science shows nature is leading us into a hotter global climate that will make human survival harder, should we ignore it or not try to ameliorate its effects?