[Torie]

Thanks for sharing. Now tighten up your time line a bit, so that you can lock horns with matters that are actually at issue. Actually I have no opinion on this issue. Rush Limbaugh simply was unable to persuade me as to the negative. I can't imagine why that was.

[Sabertooth]

Thanks for sharing. Now tighten up your time line a bit, so that you can lock horns with matters that are actually at issue.

The timeline is precisely the issue because global weather patterns happen on a millenial scale. Even hundred year weather patterns that fluctuate one way or the other even out over time, revealing the underlying trends.

The Global Warming Chicken Littles are jumping to conclusions from questionable data and small samples. It's like trying to forecast the stock market based on a week's results as reported by the nightly news.

Actually I have no opinion on this issue. Rush Limbaugh simply was unable to persuade me as to the negative. I can't imagine why that was.

Haven't listened to Rush much lately, so I'm not up to speed on what he was trying to negate.

I'm flagging a few of the more science-minded Freepers who I'm sure will have more info at their disposal than I.

Did you follow along with some of the other posts on the Ozone thread the other day?

The Ozone crisis is a hoax, and so is human-induced Global Warming.