Okay, so let me see if I can construct a plausible scenario here. Condit and Levy, playing the games lovers play, exchange meaningful articles of jewelry (her ring, his watch). On July 10th, 2001, Condit is observed ditching the watchbox on the day that he agrees to allow police to search his apartment. Concurrently, police begin searching Rock Creek Park extensively.
While circumstantial, does it not appear that Condit knew Levy was dead and located in Rock Creek Park, and that his watch would be found with the body? Would that not explain his need to get rid of the evidence tying him to the watch? And given that Levy's apartment had been searched and Condit, apparently, had not been approached about a man's watch found there, would the only reason for him to get rid of the box be that he knew the watch was with her and suspected her body would be found soon? Does this not indicate that he knew where the body would be found?
Looking for evidence:... We are looking for a ring, a watch, a bracelet and keys... What do they have in common? ....All metal detectable, all capable of holding fingerprints.....Two of the objects identify Chandra (ring and keys)......Two of the objects identify GARY (Watch and bracelet)....A normal thief would take the bracelet, ring and watch but NOT the keys....If she had a fanny pak (which is a found item I believe), her keys would most likely have been in there.....Gary must have forgot about the watchbox until he was cleaning his office and remembered the watch as one of the items he tossed in a trash container (he's a repeater). It may have been in a trash container in the Park or in a trash container where he dumped the watchbox. The two dumps which receive the rubbish for those sites should be checked. Where's the darn watch?? Sac