To: Diddle E. Squat
Well, let's see the relevancy of this ring could be that if the ring was found WITH the body, and it is shown that at the date of this photo (7-8/01) that Condit actually had it...oooo, now that would be a BAD thing wouldn't it?
To: Registered
Well, let's see the relevancy of this ring could be that if the ring was found WITH the body, and it is shown that at the date of this photo (7-8/01) that Condit actually had it...oooo, now that would be a BAD thing wouldn't it? That hadn't even occured to me ... good point. Makes me re-consider my earlier post. First story was that the cops found the ring with the remains, now we hear, nope, uh-huh, did not ... are the cops denying they have it in hopes of catching the perp with bait? I know that's why they got all po'd about us hearing of the tied leggings, they don't want the killer to know what they know.
To: Registered
Ahhhh.....I didn't think of it from that angle, now I understand what you are getting at. If the Wash.Times IS correct about the ring being found on her, than you may win the 2002 Columbo award.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson