[Spunky]

Yeah, Walsh pretty much destroyed his own credibility
with this case. He has been bending over backwards to try to
prove this murder was the random act of a serial
killer while conveniently overlooking all of Condit's VERY
suspicious actions.

Another person who has become somewhat famous after the killing of their child is Polly Claus's father.
I saw him on TV the other day and he said he believe's Walsh's theory.
It would be a strange coincedence under the circumstances to have had this be a random killing.
By the way what ever became of the rag sheet (Star, Inquirer?) information that
said John Walsh was posing in B rated movies or some such thing?

[rightytoo]

I remember seeing the headlines about John Walsh in the Enquirer, Star, et al. I don't know whatever happened about that. But it was then when I knew he was in the same "club" as his "brother" Bill Clinton. Then...when he came out & found some mugger to be the killer of Chandra---how transparent is that??? John Walsh isn't a murderer, but he sure doesn't want to point the finger at a fellow-adulterer.