Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ipberg
Probably because the public hospitals send them home to die, but the private hospitals keep them even though they are dying.
2 posted on 05/28/2002 8:12:38 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum
You forgot to mention why the Private hospitals keep the dead!

So they can harvest and sell the organs...

nobody wants the piano!!

3 posted on 05/28/2002 8:19:28 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Did they include the V.A. Hospitals in this servey?
6 posted on 05/28/2002 8:33:43 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Garbage in, garbage out. It's fairly apparent that the authors have a drum to beat about socialized medicine, then went out on a fishing expedition to try and find statistics to fit their preconceptions. There are a lot of reasons mortality might be higher in private hospitals, among which are sicker patients going to private hospitals, less sick patients admitted and kept longer in public hospitals because of social reasons. I can tell you, having worked in both kinds of hospitals, the bureaucracy makes delivering care frustrating, but I will take my chances in a for profit facility every time. I have no problem with paying more money to places which need to maintain a good reputation and have an incentive to do a good job...making money. In many public hosptials, there is little incentive except to show up among the ancillary staff.
10 posted on 05/28/2002 8:47:25 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson