Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Your tax dollar on drugs
TownHall.com ^ | Monday, May 27, 2002 | by Debra Saunders

Posted on 05/26/2002 11:31:52 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

A new report released by the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy verifies what savvy readers already knew: National Youth Anti-Drug Media campaign ads -- which cost U.S. taxpayers almost $1 billion over five years -- don't work. What's amazing is that the Drug Czar John P. Walters readily acknowledges this fact.

The study showed that the anti- drug ads might actually have increased marijuana use among girls -- although Walters' office believes that bit of data may be inaccurate. Still, Walters agrees with the study's main finding -- the biggie -- that the ads do nothing to reduce teen-age drug use.

Life imitates Christopher Buckley's satirical novel, "Thank You for Smoking" (Random House, 1994). Its tobacco lobby anti-hero comes up with an anti-teen smoking campaign to take political heat off his industry. In reality, the campaign is designed to get kids to smoke more, and it works as teens rebel against an authoritarian voice telling them not to smoke.

I remember similar ads when I was a kid. There were anti-smoking ads and anti-smoking lectures from teachers and adults in my family (many of whom smoked). When adults asked, I always told them I wouldn't smoke. And I stuck by that line right up until the day I inhaled. (FYI, I wisely quit in my 20s.)

Duh. Scolding, nagging and lecturing won't stop a kid from doing drugs. Either a kid won't, or a kid will -- and the determining factors are complex and personal. That's why most anti-drug ads are a waste of money. Walters doesn't quite see it that way. He's decided the ad campaign is sufficiently worthless that he won't ask for more funding to continue it. But he sees hope in ads targeted to help parents keep their kids away from drugs.

One problem. The study says: "The evidence does not as yet support an effect of parent exposure on youth behavior." It could be that it doesn't matter if parents talk to their kids and monitor their behavior. Or it could take time for the message to filter through, with the first step being to change parental behavior, and the second step being a consequent change in teen behavior.

As Walters spokesman Tom Riley noted, advertising "wouldn't be a trillion-dollar industry if people believed that ads don't make a difference."

And since the study was conducted, Walters has pushed a different kind of drug ad, as in the controversial spots that tell kids that drugs are linked to terrorism and crime. "Where do terrorists get their money?" one spot asked. "If you buy drugs, some of it might come from you."

"A lot of people hate them," Riley noted, but Walters wanted "to plant a new idea and to generate discussion." And the ads did receive a lot of attention.

Still, just as I question whether nagging ads work, I have to question any study on the effectiveness of drug programs that rely on the answers of teen-agers who know what adults want to hear.

And what about people lying to themselves? Some 82 percent of a group of parents of teens ages 16 to 18 told researchers they had talked to their kids about drugs in the past six months; yet only 48 percent of kids that age reported the same conversation.

Which is one reason I'd be happy to see Congress gut the National Youth Anti-Drug Media campaign budget, and make it lean and mean.

Walters deserves a salute for not trying to cover up failure. He could have pushed for a report that proclaimed -- as so many government reports have done before -- that the anti-drug campaign is a smash hit because parents and kids love it. Or that the money was well-spent because 68 percent of teens recalled some of the campaign slogans.

I'll add, D.C. pols love to spend money on anti-drug ads. It's like apple pie for them, or a drug. They couldn't have wanted to learn the bad news. They believe they can spend on failed anti-drug campaigns, and their constituents will cheer. It's like an addiction. And no ad campaign will stop them.

Only the tough love of vocal voters can do that.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Monday, May 27, 2002

Quote of the Day by Avoiding_Sulla

1 posted on 05/26/2002 11:31:52 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I wonder if it would have made a difference if money spent on the War on Drugs had been used on the War on Fanatics Who Will Kill As Many of Us As They Can? I do believe we now have fewer FBI agents chasing slack-jawed meth yokels around America's farm country. The federalization of crack and meth enforcement made for many a self-congratulatory news release by U.S. Attorneys boasting of impressive Federal Sentencing Guideline prison terms. But could it be that G-men matching wits with half-witted white trash in flyover country lost their edge?

The FBI has better things to do, it would now seem. Maybe enforcement of drug laws on the local level can be done by local authorities while the feds use their training and resources against Al Qeda et al. I would like to see a twist on those dopey ads, one where a federal agent admits "the war on drugs sidetracked my agency from keeping closer tabs on terrorists."
2 posted on 05/26/2002 11:56:18 PM PDT by SalukiLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *WOD_list

3 posted on 05/27/2002 12:05:26 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Just out of curiosity....what would happen to the world economy if the war on drugs was actually won? Would it be like removing steel or paper from the market? Any FReepers out there with more economic savvy than I (which is probably most of you) please let me know what might occur if the hundreds of billions of dollars in drug-trade money was suddenly taken out of circulation. This is not a rhetorical or sarcatic post.
4 posted on 05/27/2002 12:29:11 AM PDT by PrescottBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrescottBush
It would probably put a fair size crimp in the market for high end merchandise. But nothing happens in a vacuum. If we could wave a magic wand and make drug consumption stop, then the people who had once had that monkey on their back would begin to contribute to the economy.

HOWEVER. I heartily believe that WoD will NEVER, EVER be won by fiat. Any serious attempt to do so will only crush human liberties to the breaking point which will hurt economies along with everything else. An effective fiat WoD could only fly in a police state like China.

5 posted on 05/27/2002 1:32:12 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Wolfie
Walters wanted "to plant a new idea and to generate discussion."
This preceding has been brought to you by...
Propaganda and Brainwashing (P&B)
A product from Drug Czar John P. Walters and the Federal government, who are "Here to help you".

That enough "discussion" for you Mr. Walters?

6 posted on 05/27/2002 2:54:17 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
And since the study was conducted, Walters has pushed a different kind of drug ad, as in the controversial spots that tell kids that drugs are linked to terrorism and crime. "Where do terrorists get their money?" one spot asked. "If you buy drugs, some of it might come from you."

Ahhh, the BIG LIE technique. "It worked for Hitler in the 1930's, so maybe it'll work for us now", say the bureaucrats at ONDCP.

Buy a clue, a$$holes: the kids see right through those lies: "Weed doesn't come from Osama; my friend's brother grows it in the basement, and he's no terrorist." It's time to end this War on Citizens, and direct scarce law enforcement resources against real threats to our nation.

7 posted on 05/27/2002 7:05:53 AM PDT by bassmaner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
it is starting to dawn on me that the issue of people taking drugs
obscures fact that both drug money and anti-drug money
is corrupting our whole government

I estimate our gov spends $5 billion a year on ''anti-drugs''
I wonder whose pockets that goes into
I don't know how to estimate money made on drugs
I figure half the money gangsters make is from sex, and half from sex
it's not only banks who launder that money who profit
it buys corruption too
8 posted on 05/27/2002 7:11:18 AM PDT by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palo verde
The War on Drugs, the new W.P.A. make-work program for out-of-work filmmakers and law enforcement washouts.
9 posted on 05/27/2002 7:20:00 AM PDT by al-andalus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Walters deserves a salute for not trying to cover up failure.

I don't know, what with this being Memorial Day weekend and all, I think I'd rather salute those who are and have in the past, fought in defense of freedom and liberty.

Perhaps at another time we can then salute failure.

10 posted on 05/27/2002 7:24:34 AM PDT by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al-andalus
I read somewhere that porno pays for the internet
I appreciate that citizens are no longer forced to sneak into bookstores

I'd like to know what all the drug money pays for
Prolly half the anti-drug money goes into make-work projects like you mention
I bet the other half goes right into gangsters' pockets
The $1 billion Congress gave to fight drugs in Colombia in last few months of clinton's Term
which was administered by his corrupt DOJ
3 months later Colombia said they spent all the money and wanted more
they burned a few fields down
which gangsters got all that money?
11 posted on 05/27/2002 7:39:28 AM PDT by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: palo verde
Plus ca change...it's still the same with Colombia and will never change. The top cop down there just resigned last week after the 'inexplicable' disappearance of $2 million in U.S. drug-fighting aid. Will he be going to jail? Are you kidding me? He'll be going to Miami with a nice little retirement nest egg.

In the meantime, Bush proclaims that Colombia 'stands tall' in the fight against terrorism. The truth is, they stand knee-deep in U.S. dollars. Just like the rest of the Drug War, pure Alice in Wonderland.
12 posted on 05/27/2002 8:31:18 AM PDT by al-andalus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: al-andalus
excellent post al
I agree with you
you summed it up

clinton is gangster so under his helm money went directly to the gangsters in South America
George Bush is honest guy and is prolly not aware of this
prolly now money has to take indirect route to reach the gangsters there

I don't know what the solution is
cept for us to cut off money to fed gov
if they don't have money to fund the so-called war on drugs
we'll stop enriching the gangsters in South America
of course they get plenty money from drugs
and I bet not a few governments down there are under threat of bein' taken over by gangsters now

I'll vote Libertarian in next election
if they stop the war on drugs and cut out fed income tax
seems like it would solve it
13 posted on 05/27/2002 9:01:16 AM PDT by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SalukiLawyer
Good point. I also wonder what would have happened if all that advertising money had been channelled into after-school programs (community or church or both) for kids so they had the ultimate defense against drugs: SOMETHING BETTER TO DO!

When I was in junior high and high school in the late '60s and early '70s, my sister, my friends and I all knew who the drug dealers were. Our parents, being no dummies, didn't "just say no" -- they provided and/or encouraged other interests, and it wasn't just the chores.

To this day, our crowd would rather read, listen to music, see a movie or a play, get outdoors, or create something. Our kids are the same way.

14 posted on 05/27/2002 1:01:33 PM PDT by macclim8ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck, PrescottBush
Narco-Dollars for Beginners
15 posted on 05/28/2002 4:36:22 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson