Skip to comments.
The Air Marshal Arts: Dress to Kill, and Keep the Eyes in the Back of Your Head Open
NY Times ^
| 5-25-02
| MATTHEW L. WALD
Posted on 05/25/2002 8:29:48 AM PDT by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
In another drill, in a "shoot house" where visitors could observe from a bulletproof balcony, three marshals fired semiautomatic pistols, Sig Sauer 229's loaded with .357-caliber rounds, to bring down three hijackers. There is a protocol, firing bullets in sets of three. "Two to the chest, one upstairs; two to the chest, one upstairs," said Brad Delauter, a senior instructor. The marshals are supposed to be able to fire three shots in 6 seconds; in 15 seconds they are supposed to fire three, reload and fire another three. Their guns, Swiss-designed and German-built, hold 13 rounds but in training are loaded with 3 to require frequent reloading.
I always thought it was one and one, not two and then one. Why two to the chest? More likely immediate stopping power? Any pros out there with an answer? Thanks in advance.
1
posted on
05/25/2002 8:29:48 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
The chest IS a much easier target, of a moving target... the final "head" shot is the certain, "permanent" shot we all would prefer to see... versus the lengthy court drama of the poor, misguided terrorists.
2
posted on
05/25/2002 8:41:38 AM PDT
by
Terridan
To: Pharmboy
The two to the chest, one to the head is called a Mozambique drill. It's supposed to simulate a course of action for a target wearing body armor.
3
posted on
05/25/2002 8:53:13 AM PDT
by
cryptical
To: Pharmboy
In the sake of diversity I hope they include Americans and legal immigrants in these drills. We need a diverse group to represent America including armed arab sky marshalls. /humor
4
posted on
05/25/2002 8:54:23 AM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: cryptical; Terridan
A Mozambique Drill. Nice. Thanks for the info guys.
5
posted on
05/25/2002 9:09:36 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
"Another part of the training is how to find a bomb in carry-on baggage while the plane is in flight, and where in the passenger cabin to put it to reduce the chance that it will make the plane crash."
Just a thought, but why can't planes have some sort of chamber area in the bottom of the plane, with an bottom exterior door, and an interior door, that a suspected bomb can be placed in, the interior door closed, and the bottom door opened to release the 'bomb' outside the plane? No loss of cabin pressure that way and bomb-b-gone.
To: Still Using Air
"No loss of cabin pressure that way and bomb-b-gone." Citizens living below and on the flight path might not appreciate the gift.
--Boris
7
posted on
05/25/2002 9:19:31 AM PDT
by
boris
To: Still Using Air
I've wondered the same thing--useful for would-be terrorists too. Not being an aero-engineer, I haven't worked out the details of opening and closing the lower hatch. I would think the wind turbulence would make it difficult to purge the compartment if it opens to the bottom of the plane. You wouldn't want a "blow-off" type hatch. Might need it for multiple uses. I am thinking more in the line of a compartment that opens to the back. Kind of a mini version of military cargo plane openings. Hang a small drogue chute on the offending cargo/terrorist and let the wind do the rest.
8
posted on
05/25/2002 9:32:05 AM PDT
by
NerdDad
To: boris
OK. Simply include a detonating device with the 'parcel', drop it by 'chute, and detonate it somewhere between the plane and the ground? That really doesn't so so hard, does it?
To: Still Using Air
heh... but then again, you'd have a bomb on board at all times.
To: Still Using Air
Just a thought, but why can't planes have some sort of chamber area in the bottom of the plane, with an bottom exterior door, and an interior door, that a suspected bomb can be placed in, the interior door closed, and the bottom door opened to release the 'bomb' outside the plane? No loss of cabin pressure that way and bomb-b-gone.Well
the first thing that jumps into my mind is the fact that this would admit the existence of threats beyond the control of the all knowing all seeing guberment who wants to take away your rights in the name of safety.
Who appoints the former head of the notoriously anti-gun BATF to the TSA and then axes the pilots from carrying guns on the flightdeck and tells us that only guberment can carry on a plane.
Besides, theres no need for this type of device on a plane
those professional federalized security screeners will catch them all well before they make it aboard. The guberment said so
TMMT
To: Pharmboy
To: Pharmboy
Was taught this procedure in USAF security training. First shots are to the body mass for stopping/slowing, and because the body is easier to hit. Head shot is the sure-kill in case the assailant is wearing a vest. Even with the vest, two shots to the chest is going to knock them down, make the head easier to hit. I have no doubt we have some folks on FR who can/will provide first hand accounts of the value and limitations of vests in this regard.
13
posted on
05/25/2002 9:40:45 AM PDT
by
NerdDad
To: Still Using Air
Can you say "pressure-activated trigger" ?? Pressure drops, goes off immediately ? Lots of fuel tanks on the bellies of aircraft. . .
14
posted on
05/25/2002 10:35:40 AM PDT
by
Salgak
To: Still Using Air
heh... but then again, you'd have a bomb on board at all times. The probablility of a bomb being on board a plane is, say, twenty thousand to one.
Then, the probability of having two bombs on the plane would be four hundred million to one.
Therefore, you should always make sure there's a bomb on the plane.
15
posted on
05/25/2002 10:52:16 AM PDT
by
Erasmus
To: Pharmboy
Dominate + Intimidate = Control
Pretty much describes the federal government in a nutshell.
16
posted on
05/25/2002 11:53:30 AM PDT
by
gunnut
To: NerdDad
I've wondered the same thing--useful for would-be terrorists too. Not being an aero-engineer, I haven't worked out the details of opening and closing the lower hatch. I would think the wind turbulence would make it difficult to purge the compartment if it opens to the bottom of the plane. You wouldn't want a "blow-off" type hatch. Might need it for multiple uses. I am thinking more in the line of a compartment that opens to the back. Kind of a mini version of military cargo plane openings. Hang a small drogue chute on the offending cargo/terrorist and let the wind do the rest.Interesting... But simpler still would be a compartment that's heavily reinforced on all sides except the outer skin, so that the blast would become a shaped charge that only blows away that weaker portion of the outer skin. It'd be cheaper - fewer moving parts - but still safer than finding the least-bad part of the passenger cabin in which to have the bomb go off.
17
posted on
05/25/2002 12:05:31 PM PDT
by
jennyp
To: Pharmboy
When my Sherriff buddy taught me to shoot his Beretta his pattern was one to the head two to the body. Kind of a triangular pattern. Nice gun too.
To: Bogey78O
They looked real except that each was cut off at midthigh so the torso would be in the proper position when propped up on the seat.Finally solved the leg room problem, I see.
Mrs VS
To: VeritatisSplendor
"Finally solved the leg room problem, I see." In a thousand years, they will dig up an airliner and conclude that we were all four feet tall.
--Boris
20
posted on
05/25/2002 4:39:54 PM PDT
by
boris
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson