I didn't ask you specifically about harboring a fugative. I asked you whether a government should have the power to prohibit voluntary transactions with a fugative. It's a simple question to which a one word answer should suffice. The fact that you avoid giving an answer tells me a lot about your supposed libertarian convictions.
ML/NJ
Harboring or conducting a "voluntary transaction" (vague as that is). Not much difference in the essense of what you're asking, really. Still the analogy is weak and the fact that you'd turn it around to denigrate my politics is really an admission on your part of how weak the analogy is.
So, tell me, what exactly does it tell you about my libertarian convictions, since you didn't offer that?