Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tiny IBM transistor beats silicon
MSNBC (Reuters) ^ | 20 May 2002

Posted on 05/20/2002 4:53:36 PM PDT by sourcery

NEW YORK, May 20 — International Business Machines Corp., the world’s largest computer maker, said on Monday it has built a transistor that outperforms today’s top silicon-based semiconductors and may be the key to smaller, faster computers.

ARMONK, NEW YORK-BASED IBM said it used a carbon nanotube — a tiny cylindrical structure made up of carbon atoms that is about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair — to make a transistor similar to today’s silicon-based electronic switches, or transistors.

The carbon nanotube transistor outperformed the fastest silicon transistor, IBM said, giving the company’s research division confidence that commercial microchips could one day be made out of carbon nanotube transistors.

When IBM first said last year it had made a tiny transistor based on nanotubes, it couldn’t show that a nanotube transistor could carry more than twice the electric current of a silicon transistor.

“The small (size) is of course very important, but it is a little bit overhyped. It is really the performance we are after,” said Phaedon Avouris, manager of nanoscience and nanotechnology for IBM Research.

Chips are used in everything from large corporate computers that run huge databases, to handheld computers, cell phones and toasters.

Scientists are looking for a replacement for silicon because in the next 10 to 15 years they expect it will no longer be possible to improve on chips using silicon, which would limit improvements in chip size and speed.

Under Moore’s law, named for Intel Corp. co-founder Gordon Moore, the number of transistors on a chip doubles every 18 months, resulting in a rough doubling of computing power.

In addition to looking at using the carbon nanotube, which is the strongest fiber in nature and 10 times stronger than steel, scientists are also studying the possibility of quantum computing based on atoms.

© 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: nanotechnology; techindex

1 posted on 05/20/2002 4:53:36 PM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Tech_index;Ernest_at_the_Beach
*Index Bump and fyi
2 posted on 05/20/2002 5:37:07 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
This is great! I usually buy a new PC every 2.5 - 3 years (18 mos + plus time for the bugs to get worked out). I just bought one, so I guess I'll be meeting a wholly different technology 2-3 years from now? Or maybe, sadly, the whole thing will vanish like smoke...
3 posted on 05/20/2002 5:42:22 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Not that soon. Perhaps a decade. There's a long lapse from the lab to the mass market PC. Several layers of complex, expensive, distinctly different technology are layered on top of each other to produce a PC, and it takes 2-4 years per layer best case for seriously different technology to work its way up the chain.
4 posted on 05/20/2002 5:48:31 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fish out of Water; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; ErnBatavia...
Thanks for the ping!

I''ll go ahead and put this easy access script in here and ping some other folks!

To find all articles tagged or indexed using tech_index

Click here: tech_index

5 posted on 05/20/2002 6:06:03 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Well, this gives me something to live for, then. Being a heat-seeker - which always means that I buy early, pay too much, and then don't get support - I'm already looking forward to it!
6 posted on 05/20/2002 6:38:10 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow;livius
"Not that soon. Perhaps a decade. "

As an ex-chip maker of thirty years, I agree.

7 posted on 05/20/2002 9:51:33 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
bump
8 posted on 05/21/2002 9:46:32 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson