Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThomasJefferson
Since government schools are mandatory for those who do not have the resources to educate them privately it is a good thing that government employees are not given the right to touch children for purposes of "punishment".

If you send your child to a government school, you must live within the bounds of the school. If your child is disruptive, they will be punished in a manner decided by the school. If you don't like the method, you can remove your child.

Your child will be hit in school. That is guaranteed. The question is whether the attacker will be sufficiently deterred from hitting your child again. If you want to remove the consequences, that is your business. But your child will live with that deterrence. I would rather my son get paddled in school than beaten by his classmates. I have children in a public elementary school and their biggest complaint is lack of discipline by wimpy administrators.

11 posted on 05/20/2002 11:16:39 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
If you send your child to a government school, you must live within the bounds of the school.

That is precisely why government schools should be abolished. Particularly because the is no choice to opt out for some people. The attendance is mandatory even for people who do not have the resources to opt out.

If your child is disruptive, they will be punished in a manner decided by the school.

I don't know what state you live in but In Illinois, corporal punishment is forbidden and it has been since I was in elementary school in the 50s, probably before then. Rightfully so.

If you don't like the method, you can remove your child.

I thought I made it clear that we were talking about people without an option like that.

Your child will be hit in school. That is guaranteed. The question is whether the attacker will be sufficiently deterred from hitting your child again.

None of my three children has ever been hit in school. And they won't be because their primary education is now ended.

If you want to remove the consequences, that is your business. But your child will live with that deterrence.

See above comment.

I would rather my son get paddled in school than beaten by his classmates. I have children in a public elementary school and their biggest complaint is lack of discipline by wimpy administrators.

It's OK with me if you choose to have government employees physically touch your children, I do not choose that. I assume my own responsibilites, I do not cede them to anyone, certainly not government employees.

12 posted on 05/20/2002 11:30:29 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
If you send your child to a government school, you must live within the bounds of the school.

FALSE!! Government schools are compulsory and governmental, therefore they have NO AUTHORITY to usurp parental rights.

66 posted on 05/20/2002 2:02:51 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson