FBI, CIA back under microscope
Posted on 05/19/2002 9:59:40 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
FBI, CIA back under microscope
After lull in criticism, unshared data revive calls to dig, change
05/19/2002
WASHINGTON - It's been a wild roller-coaster ride for the FBI and CIA since Sept. 11.
Accused of massive intelligence failures immediately after the terrorist attacks, the agencies largely silenced critics with effective performances overseas and at home hunting down al-Qaeda cells, thwarting new attacks and helping topple the Taliban government that shielded Osama bin Laden.
No more.
Congressional anger is back with a vengeance, stoked by the revelation that President Bush was advised in August that al-Qaeda terrorists might seek to hijack airplanes.
That advisory coupled with the government's failure to share or consider several bits of information that some contend could have led U.S. authorities to connect the dots before Sept. 11 has members of Congress in a lather.
"There was a lot of information. I believe and others believe, if it had been acted on properly, we may have had a different situation on Sept. 11," said Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
AP An unidentified FBI agent stands guard outside the Federal Building in Los Angeles on Sept. 11. |
Though the House and Senate intelligence committees have for months been jointly investigating the events leading up to Sept. 11, many congressional Democrats are demanding broader hearings to look at actions taken by the FBI, the CIA and now the White House.
"We need to know what the White House knew, when they knew it, what they did about it, and why this didn't come to light till now," House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., said Friday.
Democrats on the Senate and House judiciary committees are demanding that their panels conduct hearings. And a bipartisan group of senators that long ago introduced legislation that would set up a Pearl Harbor-type commission to investigate the Sept. 11 tragedy last week renewed its call for an independent inquiry.
"The questions about what was known prior to Sept. 11 continue to grow and multiply each day. We cannot leave an investigation of this matter to a behind-closed-doors review by the intelligence community and intelligence committees," House Judiciary Committee Democrats wrote to the committee's chairman, Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.
Not assigning blame
White House and GOP officials contend that Democrats have latched onto the issue in an election-year bid to dent Mr. Bush's high popularity ratings. In a speech Thursday in New York, Vice President Dick Cheney warned Democrats "to not seek political advantage by making incendiary suggestions ... that the White House had advance information that would have prevented the tragic attacks of 9-11."
"Such commentary is thoroughly irresponsible and totally unworthy of national leaders in a time of war," he said.
Democrats rejected the claim that they are on a partisan fishing expedition.
"Cooler heads have to prevail here. It's not about assigning blame," said Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the second-ranking Democrat in the House. "What we want to do is prevent it [a terrorist attack] from happening again."
Partisan wrangling aside, the CIA and particularly the FBI are in for far sharper scrutiny than was the case even a few days ago. For the FBI, it could mark a return to the dark days of 2001, when the bureau was under fire for a series of missteps the embarrassing Robert Hanssen spy scandal, the mishandling of documents in the Timothy McVeigh case, the troubled Wen Ho Lee investigation, lost guns and laptop computers, and more.
Centralized operation
Rusty Capps, a retired FBI counterterrorism expert, is skeptical that a congressional investigation will be thoughtful and comprehensive.
"They haven't done it in the past," he said. Congress is "first and foremost a political vehicle that's going to take and make political hay when and where it can."
Rather than investigating what the president knew and when he knew it, Mr. Capps said, Congress should ask why the U.S. government still lacks a centralized operation to take in the intelligence collected by the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency and other government agencies and analyze it for the president and other top leaders.
Failure to share information and get it to the proper sources is at the center of much of the ire toward the FBI.
The bureau did not act on or share with the CIA a July 2001 classified memo in which a Phoenix FBI agent warned that al-Qaeda might be using U.S. flight schools as training grounds for terrorists. The agent suggested that the FBI canvass the nation's 2,000-plus flight schools to learn more about Middle Eastern students.
Appearing May 8 before the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI Director Robert Mueller faced a barrage of questions about the memo, which has only been shared with the CIA in recent weeks.
"I believe the Phoenix memo is going to come to be one of the most important documents in our national debate about whether we did enough to protect America from the attack of Sept. 11," Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., told the director.
Mr. Mueller acknowledged that headquarters should have paid more attention to the memo. "Do I wish that we had more aggressively followed up on that suggestion at the time? Yes. Are we taking steps to address what the failings or weaknesses were prior to Sept. 11? Absolutely," he said.
Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats appeared particularly perplexed that the Phoenix memo wasn't shared widely with FBI field offices particularly in Minneapolis, where agents arrested flight school student Zacarias Moussaoui in August.
Despite a furious investigation into Mr. Moussauoi's background, Minneapolis agents couldn't tie him to terrorism before Sept. 11. Officials call the Frenchman the would-be 20th hijacker and have charged him with conspiracy in the attacks. His trial is scheduled to begin this fall.
Mr. Mueller revealed to the committee that a Minneapolis FBI agent speculated in a memo before Sept. 11 that Mr. Moussaoui could be the type to crash a plane into the World Trade Center information also not shared with the intelligence community.
There is widespread agreement that the FBI and CIA, which historically have had strained relations, have worked much more closely particularly since Sept. 11.
While acknowledging that the relationship "has never been better," a senior intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: "The problem is not so much the inability of the FBI to share information with the CIA. The problem is the inability of the FBI to share information with the FBI."
FBI officials didn't return calls seeking comment. But Mr. Mueller has said that the fundamental reorganization he is implementing to shift the FBI away from a traditional reactive law enforcement posture to one of prevention and disruption is designed in part to improve information sharing within the FBI. The effort has strengthened the counterterrorism and counterintelligence division at headquarters.
'Asleep or inept'
Meanwhile, the FBI is facing increasing demands from Capitol Hill to declassify and release the Phoenix memo. Mr. Shelby said the document would show that the FBI was "either asleep or inept or both."
The sharp language is a key departure from recent months, when lawmakers from both parties kept criticism of the FBI to a minimum and lavished praise on Mr. Mueller, especially for his reorganization efforts.
Mr. Mueller, who took the reins of the FBI a week before the terrorist attacks, has moved rapidly to beef up the bureau's antiquated technology, hire agents fluent in Arabic and other languages, and bring in analysts capable of sifting through the reams of intelligence acquired in Afghanistan and around the world.
Author Ronald Kessler, a longtime FBI critic, praised Mr. Mueller's moves.
"I think when [lawmakers] look into things, they will find Mueller is doing exactly what anybody would want him to do," said Mr. Kessler, author of the newly released The Bureau: The Secret History of the FBI .
E-mail mmittelstadt@dallasnews.com
"We need to know what the White House knew, when they knew it, what they did about it, andYeah, Dick. That's a good one. What did you do with the same information, huh??........
why this didn't come to light till now," House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., said Friday.
By all means, if the democrats really want to have hearings, let's have them! I would very much like to know about what Clinton knew and when *he* knew it, about what the FBI knew (and covered up), about how the Pentagon was bugged, our computers were hacked, about how our nuclear labs "lost" nuclear secrets.
The Dems can't have it both ways. When Governor Ridge warns that further attacks are possible, the Dems claim he's alarming the American people unnecessarily. When the government acts cautiously, unwilling to release a warning after a vague hint of threat, the government is called incompetent. No justice there.
Of course, now we know that there were repeated warnings from FBI field agents that were ignored by the leadership. The question is why the warnings were ignored and what the information was.
Now you've gone and done it. Laid it out on the table. I agree with you 100% on wanting answers to all the stated questions.
By shedding the light of day on some of the unanswered questions we just might start seeing who those people are that are less than patriotic, who the enablers, "moles" and "enemy sympathizers".
I don't see this as a glitch in our intelligence services but rather as a deliberate dismantling of their effectiveness.
Anyone who has ever worked near federal LE (I did) knows that the FBI and CIA have never shared anything with one another. They are most happy when the other agency is sitting with egg on their faces. In general, federal agencies do not share information--it's a territorial pi$$ing contest--your tax dollars at work!
This is not just a federal problem--the problem is just as applicable at the state, county and municipal levels.
It would be nice, considering our current crisis, that this mentality would change, but I seriously doubt it.
I hope it does. It needs to happen.
Thanks, you nailed it there!
LOL...with the Vast LeftWing Medyuh Whore'd, the RATS can have it as many ways as the Sheeple will swallow...MUD
In my not particularly humble opinion, the vast majority of the American public are sheeple--waiting for someone to tell them what to think.
That's right; nor, is it a new problem, either.
I recall in military law enforcement there was the reg beat guys, then came MPI & when something was really serious, in came CID.
CID never discussed anything (outside of an interview/interrogation setting) with MPI; nevermind the reg MPs.
The feeling I got from these Special Agents? (~at least from the POV of a Desk Sgt.)
Was that CID was a very closed organization.
The CID guys didn't trust anyone outside of their office with any details concerning any investigation, whatsoever.
Seems insodoing?
CID would put themselves in the best possible position for the control of leaks &/or compromise(s) -- for any reason -- nearly 100% of the time on any given case.
Just might be these various governmental policing agencies have a pecking order, too; and, for damned good reason(s).
Especially in these highly charged & ultra-politicized times?
[read: the NEED to control various *infestations* of Leftist-Socialist Clintonistas, for example?]
Perfect synch would mean there'd have to be an understanding as to what kind of information would justify...even compell a sharing of information; &, most imporatntly, when one of these exchanges would take place.
*Not* an easy thing to do between individuals (as witnessed here amoung we conservatives); nevermind, huge, bloated bureaucracies the size of what we're speaking about, here.
National good or no national good.
"It would be nice, considering our current crisis, that this mentality would change, but I seriously doubt it."
Yea-yea...
Got to wait for the afterlife for that kind of scenario, Angel. ;^)
...I'm afraid a certain level of discoordination's actually built into the *system*, Learned1; on purpose.
This is how deep this crap goes--I knew a lady who worked for Secret Service. Her husband was an FBI agent. She literally sat there all day with little to do because the SS didn't want her to know anything she could take back to her husband.
I could question her integrity for staying in the job--but hey, that's another subject.
...the *perfect* slogan for America's Liberal-Socialist Party; The Democrats.
See?
You've witnessed this, too.
...that's just the way of it, I'm afraid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
