Posted on 05/17/2002 2:52:50 AM PDT by Pern
A married couple is suing the District of Columbia after they were denied the right to give their baby the mother's last name.
Margaret McGilvray and Daniel Redmond had a son, their first child, on March 11, and wanted to name him Alexander Hayden Redmond McGilvray. Their plan was thwarted when hospital officials in Washington, D.C., told them the practice was outlawed.
A guideline, written by Urbane Bass III, the district's chief of vital records, reads, "If the mother was married at the time of birth, the surname of the child shall be the legal surname of the father at birth."
"We were blown away that such an antiquated rule was on the books and still being upheld," Ms. McGilvray, a management consultant, said.
The district rejected the couple's application to register Alexander's birth under the couple's chosen name. Ms. McGilvray, 40, and Mr. Redmond, 35, responded this week with a lawsuit against the city, filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington.
The suit alleges the guideline is unconstitutional because it invades the couple's "liberty, privacy rights and their right to make family decisions free from government intrusion."
Tony Bullock, spokesman for Anthony Williams, the Mayor of Washington, yesterday said the district's political leadership is anxious to update the rule. "We're really just learning about this. Hats off to the couple who pressed the issue.
"This law has no place in modern times and is a throwback to a paternalistic view of the world which is no longer relevant."
Nah
Id bet on the existence of a wealthy McGilvray grandpa anxious to pass on his name (and $$$$).
However, knowing government, they may pass five laws to support the new position.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.