Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stanley found Guilty! DenverAttorney: Constitution null and void
The Stanley for U.S. Senate 2002 Colorado Campaign - News Release ^ | May 16, 2002 | Michelle Konieczny

Posted on 05/16/2002 6:40:18 PM PDT by LibertyRocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
Sorry this is so long, and not sweetly edited. I wanted to provide as much information as possible so that the real issues come out in this case.

Rick Stanley will be on the radio tomorrow morning at 6:30AM. Stanley will be a guest on Peter Boyles' Denver morning drive-time show which airs on KHOW-630AM.

Check morning editions of papers in Denver and CO Springs for coverage...
Rick was interviewed by the AP, the Rocky Mountain News, The Denver Post, and the Colorado Springs Gazette, His case was spoken of on National Public Radio at least once at shortly after 4pm MST.... Thank you to all the Freepers who are helping us spread the word. We may have all known this was the state of affairs, but never before have we had a judge and an attorney state it so blatantly. It figures the Judge got his JD in Boulder, CO!

1 posted on 05/16/2002 6:40:22 PM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Very strange. I'm quite sure that for the US Constitution to be void in Denver it would have to have been amended to that effect. Absent any proof of that, I'd suggest that the City of Denver is in violation of 18 USC 241 (Conspiracy against rights).
2 posted on 05/16/2002 7:03:26 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks, Verax, Robert Teesdale, glasser
Spread the word... Denver seceded in 1906...
3 posted on 05/16/2002 7:12:24 PM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
Bump!
4 posted on 05/16/2002 7:16:46 PM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Shouldn't the ACLU be getting involved, and the Green Party? They both claim to be faithful defenders of the Bill of Rights.
5 posted on 05/16/2002 7:46:32 PM PDT by CaptainTrips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Who elase heard the City Atty say this?
6 posted on 05/16/2002 7:48:31 PM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
The judge was heard to say:

Constitution?!!

Constitution???

We donn need no stinken Costitution!!!!

7 posted on 05/16/2002 7:55:28 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
How about a less biased source???

IF these statements are accurate (but I doubt that, no lawyer I know would ever say the constitution has no force), then they are pretty scary.

I'd like to see an independent news source document this stuff.

8 posted on 05/16/2002 7:56:17 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Nice how voir dire weeds out all but the retarded.
9 posted on 05/16/2002 7:58:18 PM PDT by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Here's what a patriot wrote. I took this from Rick Stanley's email to me:

"...Say, Rick, I was wondering - when you all leave Denver, do you have to get a visa to visit in the united States of America or a green card to work outside of Denver. Also, in case I get a wild hair up my butt, where do I go to get a visa to visit the dictatorship, Denver. As I understand it, it is now a country foreign to the united States of America. At least that is what your sh*t-for-brains judge and city attorney has said...."

So Rick Stanley has sacrificed himself to expose the City of Denver for what it is -- a Totalitarian territory, operating outside the constraints of the Colorado and U.S. Constitutions.

I guess "home rule" is the little socialist code word that will be popping up in court rooms all over the U.S. when inividual citizens attempt to assert their "Constitutionally-protected Rights" which are NOT being protected by anyone.

POLICE STATE freepers!! GOVERNMENT TYRANNY!! Any of you Republican-Bushie-Cheerleaders give a crap?

10 posted on 05/16/2002 8:07:38 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: jude24
It was a public trial. You can order (and pay for) a court transcript. I spoke with Rick Stanley on the phone last night and tonight. He assured me that those statements were absolutely true. It is scary! Many of you are just finding out what many of us have known for years. But we're all nutcase conspiracy theorists. Don't don't pay no attention to us.
12 posted on 05/16/2002 8:11:18 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grut
I'm quite sure that for the US Constitution to be void in Denver it would have to have been amended to that effect.

What's the big surprise here? The U.S. Constitution has been void in the entire United States since 1913. Where ya been?

13 posted on 05/16/2002 8:13:20 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Excellent work by the jury. I would be interested in reading a factual and objective account of this trial, rather than some babbling inaccurate libertarian press release.
14 posted on 05/16/2002 8:16:36 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24;libertyrocks
I'd like to see an independent news source document this stuff.

Agreed. I think both LIberty Rocks and Stanley are seeking their 15 minutes of fame. No doubt they've slanted the truth in their attempts.

15 posted on 05/16/2002 8:18:04 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
You do realize you pronounced on the wisdom of a verdict and then immediately stated you had no facts as to the matter?
16 posted on 05/16/2002 8:19:51 PM PDT by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
you are such a pompous, judgmental person! it must be nice to be such a know-it-all, huh?
17 posted on 05/16/2002 8:23:21 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Excellent work by the jury. I would be interested in reading a factual and objective account of this trial, rather than some babbling inaccurate libertarian press release.

How do you know they did excellent work! You just admitted that you haven't even read an accurate and objective account. Typical rush to judgment from a no-nothing, pompous stooge who is always wrong but never in doubt.

18 posted on 05/16/2002 8:25:00 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Here ya go:

 

Senate candidate convicted on gun charge

By The Associated Press

May 16, 2002

Rick Stanley, a Libertarian candidate for the U.S. Senate, was convicted today of unlawfully carrying a weapon after he went to a rally carrying a loaded handgun in a holster to make a point about gun laws.

The six-person jury deliberated just over an hour. Stanley faces up to a year in jail and a $999 fine at his sentencing on July 25.

Stanley said he will appeal and still plans to run for the Senate. A misdemeanor conviction would not bar him from holding office.

He argued the city ordinance prohibiting loaded weapons in public is unconstitutional.

"I tried to defend myself using the Constitution, and the judge wouldn't allow it," Stanley said. "This is a serious problem and the American people should know."

The Dec. 15 rally marked the 210th anniversary of the Bill of Rights, and Stanley said he brought the Beretta .38-caliber semiautomatic handgun to illustrate his right to bear arms under the Second Amendment During the trial, defense attorney Paul Grant argued that Stanley was carrying the weapon to defend himself because he had received several threats.

"You also have constitutional right to carry weapons for defensive purposes," Grant said.

19 posted on 05/16/2002 8:26:35 PM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
He donn need no steenkin facts! He a govt. man.
20 posted on 05/16/2002 8:44:42 PM PDT by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson