Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adding Trillions Of Years To The Life Of The Universe
spacedaily.com ^ | 3 May 02 | staff

Posted on 05/03/2002 9:41:32 AM PDT by RightWhale

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: RightWhale
Plasma theory is more realistic, in my hiumble opinion.

15 billion years is too short a time to create the needed haevy metals from H2 - if you use current supernova populations and lifetimes.... combined with the "less than speed of light" requirement for "moving" the newly-created heavier atoms between subsequent supernova's.

If you assume supernova's were more common (with a much, much faster lifetimes between initial stellar birth through supernova) in early time, then you must explain why they are tens of thousands of times slower now.

Barring all that ... why not congratulate the author of Genisis for getting the entire evolution, continental drift, and cosmic creation Story right?

His sequence is correct .... just off a little bit in the powers-of-ten decimal place(s)! [Not bad if you consider zero's hadn't been invented yet.]

61 posted on 05/03/2002 2:17:20 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Neil Turok is a Vulcan time-traveller from the future.
62 posted on 05/03/2002 2:17:23 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The thing about it that I really liked was that because time is infinite, every possible permutation of initial conditions would eventually repeat, also an infinite number of times.
In other words, we've all been here before an infinite number of times and will be here in the future an infinite number of times. And not only as ourselves, but as every possible permutation of ourselves, experiencing every possible outcome to our lives . . . Someday RightWhale will be president!!! :-)

And someday Clinton will be in jail. :-)

63 posted on 05/03/2002 2:19:01 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Great theory, except that our half is the dark universe. Stanley, Zev, and Kai are from the light universe.
64 posted on 05/03/2002 2:21:57 PM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I kind of agree. It seems like our sun is a second-generation star, or maybe third-generation. If stars live 5 billion years before exploding to create heavier elements, then there would be just time for the sun to be created from older debris with no rest period for tired nuclei. It's just a nagging feelng that the galaxy might be a lot older than 15 billion years so the creation of the heavier elemnents could proceed at a more leasurely pace.
65 posted on 05/03/2002 2:23:11 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Ah, so you think the universe isn't really trillions of years old, rather it is less than 100 years old? If that's not the case, than no one alive is observing the 'birth' of the universe.
66 posted on 05/03/2002 2:30:22 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
the universe isn't really trillions of years old

It's much older. And being born right now. The brane, fractal, and gravastar ideas all support that idea to some degree.

67 posted on 05/03/2002 2:41:07 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: handk
No, see, it was a joke, a play on words. See, there's this Ramones song,....(sigh) ah, never mind.
69 posted on 05/03/2002 3:02:56 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
No one observed the beginning of the universe

Except for maybe Arthur Dent, Zaphod Beeblebrox, and a few others...

70 posted on 05/03/2002 3:03:49 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: filbert
SQUEAK?
71 posted on 05/03/2002 3:26:25 PM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
An energy field that pervades the universe...

Yeah, kinda like "The Force."

72 posted on 05/03/2002 3:54:10 PM PDT by Doomonyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
kinda like "The Force."

More like mattress padding.

73 posted on 05/03/2002 3:56:56 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Someday RightWhale will be president!!! :-)

As Woody Allen said when asked what he'd like to come back as:

"Warren Beatty's fingertips."

74 posted on 05/03/2002 4:17:09 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Do any of these turtles have elephants walking on their backs?

Doubtful; to top-most turtle has the Universe on its back, and he's standing on the back of the one beneath him, and so on, ad infinitum. Not much room for elephants.

75 posted on 05/03/2002 4:28:10 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; physicist; radioastronomer; scully; vaderetro; junior
Eternally oscillating universe bump. Turtles everywhere!
76 posted on 05/03/2002 5:26:05 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Thanks for the ping, longshadow.

I love Hawking's turtle story. It is told as a true anecdote.
Fascinating thing about the natural sciences is that there seems to be an infinite array of surprises and mysteries laid out before us ...

77 posted on 05/03/2002 6:59:27 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Confederate Keyester
Man created "God" in his own image.

What better way to explain the inexplicable? To comprehend the incomprehensible?

God is best described as the "Creator", and not as the Heavenly "Father". God may well be a somewhat Cosmic Consciousness that naturally guides the infinite creation and re-creation of all that "is".

Theory, really.

78 posted on 05/03/2002 7:23:29 PM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
The fact is, since no one observed it occuring, it's pretty much guesswork.

It does seem a bit like the Blake and OJ "crimes," doesn't it?

79 posted on 05/03/2002 8:14:58 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
there is a kind of stability in cyclical processes, a permanence.

I am no scientist, but many years ago I have read that the Universe is "infinite" another words "no beginning and no end" it just exist.
Now the Bible sez that God is the "alpha and omega" of everything.I did not know that God speaks greek, since the greeks have their own mythology and self proclaimed Gods!

I am not trying to stir up any controversy, but this is a subject I have tried to get some straight answers since I was a little kid. My parents, strong christian believers, had told me "son, do not ask for proof, just trust God's word".
Well, I do believe to some degree, but I can not blindly subscribe to everything what one tells me, just because it is written in the Bible.

I think this makes me a "Thomas" who did not believe that Jesus Christ was crucified unless he had felt the actual wounds made by the nails.

80 posted on 05/03/2002 9:55:20 PM PDT by danmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson