Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concerned Women of America Blasts Fox Over Playboy Special
Newsmax ^ | 5/2/02

Posted on 05/02/2002 12:53:14 PM PDT by areafiftyone

Fox Broadcastings plan to air a racy special on Playboy magazine's notorious centerfold is drawing fire from conservative groups.

The network is due to air a two hour show, "The Girl Next Door: The Search for a Playboy Centerfold," at 8 p.m. on May 10 and organizations such as Concerned Women For America (CWA) want Fox to reconsider showing the program.

"It's men victimizing women for the sake of money and ratings," Jan LaRue, chief counsel of Concerned Women for America told the Associated Press (AP) which cited CWA as one of seven groups, including the Christian Coalition and Focus on the Family, that wrote a letter of protest to Rupert Murdoch, chairman of Fox's parent News Corp.

LaRue told AP she was concerned the special would encourage men to treat women as sex objects and sends a dangerous message to girls.

"It communicates to 12- and 13-year-old girls that this is what you have to do to be attractive to men," she said. "It dehumanizes, it objectifies and it is a gateway to hard-core pornography."

A Fox spokesman, Scott Grogin, brushed off the complaints, telling AP yesterday: "We respect all of our viewers' rights to their opinions. If this is a show they don't like or feel is appropriate, please don't watch."

The planned show will feature a dozen women who are flown to Los Angeles in hopes of becoming one of the magazine's celebrated centerfold models. They're housed at Playboy founder Hugh Hefner's infamous Playboy Mansion, and are filmed while "sunbathing by the pool (and) primping for photo shoots." After being given Hollywood shopping sprees and evenings out at restaurants and clubs, one of them is chosen by Hefner to be featured in a centerfold shoot wearing little or nothing.

The AP described the show as a cross between ABC's popular "The Bachelor" series and its Victoria's Secret fashion show aired last November which sparked a Federal Communications Commission investigation that found that it didn't violate broadcast standards for decency.

Fox has drawn fire from some of the same groups protesting the Playboy show who filed complaints with the FCC last month about Fox's "Boston Public," show, charging that the classroom drama is loaded with sexual topics, particularly for a program airing it what used to be known as television's family hour, the AP reported.

Fox defended "Boston Public" and series creator David E. Kelley, saying "we're proud to have it on our air.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: dorben
Very good point, just because your a bible thumper doesn't make you the be all end all voice of wisdom & morality.
101 posted on 05/03/2002 6:50:35 AM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"It's men victimizing women for the sake of money and ratings," Jan LaRue, chief counsel of Concerned Women for America told the Associated Press (AP) which cited CWA as one of seven groups, including the Christian Coalition and Focus on the Family, that wrote a letter of protest to Rupert Murdoch, chairman of Fox's parent News Corp.

Catholic FYI:

In 1998 Cardinal Mahoney awarded Rupert Murdoch (a non-Catholic) the title of " Knight of the Order of St. Gregory." The pope bestows the title "Knight of the Order of St. Gregory" in order "to acknowledge an individual's particular meritorious service to the Church," based on the recommendation of the local bishop.

In this case, the "meritorius service" consisted of donating $10 million to Cardinal Mahoney's hideous new cathedral which will also include a crypt for Rupert Murdoch.

102 posted on 05/03/2002 6:54:54 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HELLRAISER II
It's not for us to decide whether it's moral or not

By opposing opposition to shows like this you are deciding "whether it's moral or not."

103 posted on 05/03/2002 7:01:24 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
If you don't like it, fine. But this "men victimizing women" stuff is BS. They get paid a lot of dough, and they know what they are doing. Besides, I'd bet that a lot of the so-called victimizers here are women.

It sometimes launches million dollar careers and if not it pays them a many year salary. Doesn't sound like victimization when they CHOOSE to do this.

104 posted on 05/03/2002 7:05:46 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
A wholesale rejection of the natural law has created a society of amoral men and women who can't see the error. Light HAS turned to darkness.

Isaiah 5:20

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

A word to the wise.

105 posted on 05/03/2002 7:06:24 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
A word to the wise.

It's too bad that many Christians don't read or follow God's Word. Thanks for the post!

106 posted on 05/03/2002 7:11:48 AM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
note to DJ:

HTML Sandbox

107 posted on 05/03/2002 7:13:23 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
That's true. You notice NOW and other 'women's groups' never say much about the porn industry, et al. They are too busy talking about how awful men are to say anything negative about women posing in the buff which encourages 'awful' behavior in men.
108 posted on 05/03/2002 7:16:57 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
And some said it could never happen.
109 posted on 05/03/2002 7:31:38 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
And some said it could never happen.

It's like the new Seven-Up commercial were everyone of diameterically opposed ideologies is holding hands and singing, and then they break out into a big fight.

:-)

110 posted on 05/03/2002 7:45:10 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Do you really thing the GOP can win WITHOUT social conservatives?

Nope, but if we could go just a little while without social conservatives displaying their willingness to stick collective noses into other people's business we might have a better chance at winning.

111 posted on 05/03/2002 8:14:32 AM PDT by 68 grunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
I don't know, but when I am told by society and my own government that I must embrace homosexuality as good, that my kid is going to be taught that it is good in school, and that I should tolerate a gay scout leader taking my son camping overnight in the woods --- I feel a bit like it is THEM sticking THEIR NOSE in MY BUSINESS!

Likewise, when I am forced to pay for abortions when my conscience tells me it is the act of murdering a child --- I feel that is my business too. And frankly, since when is protecting life not everyone's business?

No formal prayer in school? fine. But stop persecuting Christian kids in school. it does happen. It happened to me.

Etc... I personally feel like it is the social liberals messing up MY freedom, not the other way around.

I don't mean any of this in a harsh tone, but with the cap stuff it might read that way. I am just telling you my perspective.

112 posted on 05/03/2002 9:06:05 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
As is their right.
113 posted on 05/03/2002 10:47:07 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
Exactly.
114 posted on 05/03/2002 10:47:49 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
One of the funniest Simpsons episodes I saw recently had Homer and Bart talking about TV. Homer says, "FOX has some really good shows and they never show trashy programs."

Homer looks at Bart and they both start laughing hysterically. How Appropriate!

115 posted on 05/03/2002 10:55:21 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Homer: "I'm buying stock in something called NewsCorp."
Lisa: "Dad, thats Fox!"
Homer: "Ahh! Undo, Undo"
116 posted on 05/03/2002 11:03:03 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
I am not only a social conservative, but a paleo conservative, and it would suit me just fine if the GOP stayed away from these types of issues and let literal father and mothers instead of figurative Big Brothers make the calls on these issues. And when I say "make the calls", I am talking about intra-family decisions not laws.
117 posted on 05/03/2002 11:03:04 AM PDT by Phillip Augustus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Phillip Augustus
Why do so many people have trouble finding the OFF button when something they dont like is on?
118 posted on 05/03/2002 11:03:48 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I agree with you that liberals by far are more active in destroying individual freedom than are conservatives; however, it should not mean that we adopt their tactics and take away the few freedoms that they have not yet succeeded in taking away.
119 posted on 05/03/2002 11:04:34 AM PDT by Phillip Augustus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Oh, and I suppose I am not a good conservative because I listen to Howard Stern on occasion?

If you want to be a fuddy-duddy, fine. But last time I checked, freedom existed here, meaning people are free to make their own mistakes. But Brent Bozell is a real jerk sometimes. Bozell does the Lord's work on media bias, but he sure comes across as a Puritan at times.

120 posted on 05/03/2002 11:09:46 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson