Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SENATORS GO INTO HIDING, APPROVE FEDERAL ZONING
LandRightsNetwork ^ | 4/29/2002 | LandRightsNetwork

Posted on 04/30/2002 10:53:27 PM PDT by goody2shooz

Federal Zoning Act passed in Committee by stealth!

The United States Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (EPW Committee) yesterday, April 25, met IN SECRET and voted to approve S. 975, the Federal Zoning Act!!!

Because of growing public opposition to S.975, the committee leadership decided to HIDE from the public and meet in a closed session!!!!!!

This is the SAME committee that hid from the public last December and approved S. 990, the "Son of CARA" land acquisition bill. When the public doesn't like what they are doing, the EPW Committee shuts out the public and votes in secret!

HOWEVER, this time around, information has leaked out about how it happened. Here is the story of this disgraceful episode, along with ACTION ITEMS below: 8:00am, Thursday, April 25:

The general public and lobbyists start lining up outside the door of Room 406 in the Dirksen Senate Office Building. This is where the EPW Committee gave public notice several days ago that the "markup"-the final debate and committee vote-on S. 975 would be held, at 9:30am that morning.

For controversial bills like S. 975, it is usually a good idea to get in line early, because there is sure to be a big crowd and there is limited seating. 9:15am:

A committee staff person announces to the people in line that the committee "markup," due to start at 9:30, has been moved. He was asked WHERE and said, "I don't have room number." He was asked WHEN and said, "I don't know, sometime after 10 o'clock." He was asked WHY and said, "The Senators are busy."

He finally admitted that the meeting was being moved to a small office in a part of the Capitol Building that was CLOSED to the general public!!! But he still insisted that it was a public meeting, just being held in a room that was closed to the public. Yes ladies and gentlemen, this kind of doubletalk does go on in Washington, DC on a daily basis!

The EPW Committee, at about 10:30am, met IN SECRET and voted to approve S. 975, the Federal Zoning Act. The vote was twelve in favor to seven against. We were able to get ahold of the roll call vote, even though the committee leadership wanted to keep it secret and hide their actions from the public. Here it is:

TWELVE IN FAVOR of S. 975:

Senator Jim Jeffords, Vermont Senator Harry Reid, Nevada Senator Max Baucus, Montana Senator Bob Graham, Florida Senator Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Senator Barbara Boxer, California Senator Ron Wyden, Oregon Senator Tom Carper, Delaware Senator Hillary Clinton, New York Senator Jon Corzine, New Jersey Senator Lincoln Caffee, Rhode Island Senator Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania

SEVEN OPPOSED to S. 975:

Senator Jim Inhofe, Oklahoma Senator Bob Smith, New Hampshire Senator John Warner, Virginia Senator Kit Bond, Missouri Senator George Voinovich, Ohio Senator Mike Crapo, Idaho Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico

HEROES AND ZEROES:

FORTUNATELY, there are some HEROES who tried to stop this sham and defend local government and private property rights.

NUMBER ONE HERO: Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma. Inhofe objected to the last minute switch from open to the public to a secret session, but was overruled. He was also the only Senator who filed a written statement objecting to S. 975.

ACTION ITEM: Please THANK Senator James Inhofe!!! See his excellent statement below. Here is his contact information:

Senator James Inhofe 453 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 202-224-4721 phone 202-228-0380 fax james_inhofe@inhofe.senate.gov

ZEROES:

Here are the three Senators who conspired to jam S. 975 through the Environment and Public Works Committee in secret and attempted to avoid having a roll call vote in order to hide their actions. Their top level staff people who are responsible for this sham are listed here.

ACTION ITEM: Tell these three Senators and their top staff what you think about the federal government mandating local zoning codes, and what you think about them canceling the public meeting at the last minute and holding the votes in secret!!!

Senator Jim Jeffords (Independent of Vermont). Phone 202-224-5141, fax 202-224-1273 ken_connolly@epw.senate.gov, sean_donohue@epw.senate.gov

Senator Harry Reid (Democrat of Nevada). Reid is THE WORST of them. Reid led the charge to sneak the "Son of CARA" Land Grab bill out of the EPW committee in secret last December, and he is primarily responsible for arranging this secret meeting as well. Phone 202-224-3542, fax 202-224-7327 susan_mccue@reid.senate.gov, nathan_taylor@reid.senate.gov, david_mccallum@reid.senate.gov

Senator Lincoln Chaffee (Republican of Rhode Island). Phone 202-224-2921, fax 202-228-2853 david_griswold@chaffee.senate.gov, jeff_neal@chaffee.senate.gov, deborah_brayton@chaffee.senate.gov

You may call any Senator at the Capitol Switchboard -- (202) 224-3121 or the temporary FREE NUMBER (800) 648-3516.

Statement of Senator James Inhofe on S. 975, Federal Zoning Act:

INHOFE: I would like to express my strong opposition to S. 975. I believe this bill raises potential constitutional questions under the Tenth Amendment, where powers not expressly granted to the federal government in the Constitution, like zoning and land-use decisions, are reserved to the local and state governments. This legislation threatens to usurp local jurisdictions ability to make their own decision on economic development, housing and transportation - all of these being unique to different localities.

By voting this legislation out of committee we are saying it is "OK" for the federal government to get involved in state, local and tribal land use planning and further more local land use planning is not important. This sets a dangerous precedent.

I have grave concerns with the notion of the Secretary of Commerce evaluating a state's need for federal funds and then prescribing the criteria for the content of the state plan, an area where the Secretary of Commerce can claim no particular expertise or authority.

In the "findings" section of this bill it states that "comprehensive land use planning and community development should be supported by the Federal, State, and tribal governments." There is no mention of support by local governments. For those of us who were local elected officials we must recognize that successful community development and comprehensive planning needs to be supported and driven by the local government. As a former Mayor this type of statement concerns me deeply.

The federal government should respect the authority and expertise of these localities to make land-use decisions without dangling a "carrot" so that they adopt planning legislation acceptable to the federal government.

THANK YOU SENATOR INHOFE!!!

Current situation:

S. 975 is now ready to go to the Senate floor, to be voted on by the entire Senate. It is unclear when that may happen. It will be at least a few weeks, and may be put off for several months, depending on how strong support and opposition becomes.

Please forward to your entire list. Thank you.

American Land Rights Association - Land Rights Network PO Box 400 - Battle Ground WA 98604 360-687-3087 360-687-2973 fx alra@landrights.org http://www.landrights.org Legislative Office: 508 First St SE - Washington DC 20003 Phone: 202-210-2357 - Fax: 202-543-7126 - Email: landrightsnet@aol.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; federalzoningact; landgrab; secrecy; sovereignty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
The Constitution under assault by the Democratic Party! They must be defeated this coming November. Republicans must retake the Senate and retain the House of Representatives or our liberty will be lost.
1 posted on 04/30/2002 10:53:27 PM PDT by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Landgrab

2 posted on 04/30/2002 11:02:17 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: infowars
Notice that Hillary Clinton is involved in this Act? We should not be surprised, I suppose.
4 posted on 04/30/2002 11:10:45 PM PDT by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
interesting
5 posted on 04/30/2002 11:17:41 PM PDT by Soul Citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
You might be interested to know that this sort of stealth disregard for the public's right to participate is not unique to the US Congress. Late last Friday afternoon the Democrats who control the Colorado State Senate pulled a similar trick by calling an "emergency" committee hearing on 15 minutes notice and then hearing a controversial property rights bill and amending it to make it toothless. All this was done in true "railroading" style to gut a bill that had strong public support.

Fortunately, there are heroes here in Colorado too. Senators Andrews, Teck, Anderson, and McElhany (all Republicans) forced the issue on the Senate floor today and, with Gov. Owens personal lobbying, managed to reverse the underhanded actions of the DEMS and get the bill reinstated in its original form, which was then passed by the full Senate!

It was a glorious day for property rights in Colorado, and landowners have the Republicans to thank for it!!

6 posted on 04/30/2002 11:18:33 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Thanks so much for this post! This is how we will all lose our homes and properties we hold so dear! This is part of the plan to make us all "equal" meaning no one but the government owns anything or manages it! Can we say socialism?
7 posted on 04/30/2002 11:24:15 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Exactly, it is part of her "village"! Makes me hurl!
8 posted on 04/30/2002 11:25:32 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laserman
Great and wonderful! I bet you had a hand in this! "You got to stand for something or you will fall for anything"...Aaron Tipton sang that! LOL What else needs to be said! Thank your reps for me!
9 posted on 04/30/2002 11:28:46 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Yes, several of us up here in Boulder County played a part, and we owe much to some reps with some guts! We will definitely tell them thanks. Not surprisingly, the worst enemies of protecting property rights were the senator (Tupa) and the Rep (Plant) from Boulder (both DEMS)! They think it is fine for County government to steal people's property rights "for the good of the community".

Thanks for the good words.

10 posted on 04/30/2002 11:34:57 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Laserman
you are more than welcome! sending you something else, I wish I knew how to link it here....see your posts to you!
11 posted on 04/30/2002 11:38:07 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
bump: Let's keep this one up until the bill fails!
12 posted on 04/30/2002 11:45:06 PM PDT by SpyderTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
For those that see no difference between Dems and Reps. Too bad there are winnies like Specter that really need to be weeded out. No Republican could support vrap like this and he needs to hear it.
13 posted on 04/30/2002 11:46:14 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpyderTim
That's just it, It won't fail in the Senate. We gotta get it back and with room to spare. Spectre has gotta go somehow as well.
14 posted on 04/30/2002 11:50:33 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SpyderTim
it does have to go to the full Senate so we must all contact our sins(senators) and rips (representatives) trying to be cute here! lol
15 posted on 04/30/2002 11:58:44 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: infowars
Why is this a dangerous bill? The article says it's terrible but doesn't come straight out and explain the contents of the bill. It seems the author has falsely presumed that all readers are fully informed about the specifics of this bill, and, as such, are in complete aggreement against the bill.

Details are useful. Inflammatory rhetoric is a turn-off.

16 posted on 05/01/2002 12:38:24 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Rudder
If you'll note, the article is part of a post found on the LandRightsNetwork site. Readers of the site are generally informed about the intentions of Congress with regards to such issues. So of course it presumes that readers are against the legislation. The site is for people who are likely going to be against it.
18 posted on 05/01/2002 1:03:56 AM PDT by SpyderTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SpyderTim
and for good measure, another bump.
19 posted on 05/01/2002 1:08:40 AM PDT by SpyderTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All
Some useful information:

Statement of Chairman James M. Jeffords Hearing on S.975, the Community Character Act, and S.1079, the Brownfield Site Redevelopment Assistance Act Wednesday, March 6, 2002

http://www.senate.gov/~epw/jef_030602.htm

Statement of Senator Lincoln D. Chafee Hearing on the Community Character Act of 2001 (S. 975) March 6, 2002

http://www.senate.gov/~epw/cha_030602.htm

For additional info see

http://www.senate.gov/~epw/stm1_107.htm#03-06-02

And scroll down to March 6.

Read the Washington Times article at

http://www.landrights.org/ubbs/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=7&t=000049

20 posted on 05/01/2002 1:23:41 AM PDT by SpyderTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson