Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: realpatriot71
ahh.......your age. If you had a 13 year old daughter, you'd probably feel a lot different. Thongs are not for kids, just like sexy "lingerie" to wear to bed is not for kids. Are do you think a 13 year old should be wearing tha, too?
486 posted on 04/30/2002 3:42:25 PM PDT by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]


To: joathome
I don't associate "thong" with "sex". I see thongs as another type of underwear - nothing more, nothing less - an option. It's people such as yourself that have attached to thongs some sort of "naughty" conotation, and therefore deem them inappropriate. Underware serves a function, and if my future daughter wants to have a full back on her underwear or not, I'm going to let her decide.
490 posted on 04/30/2002 4:28:47 PM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]

To: joathome
If you had a 13 year old daughter, you'd probably feel a lot different

i agree with you completely. having a teen right now, in this environment, makes a world of difference in outlook on this, in my opinion.

497 posted on 04/30/2002 5:15:26 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson