Cardinal Law is beginning to look like an enabler of the worst kind. Who's more guilty...the enabler or the abuser, who in many cases is psychologically unfit for his position?
I'd say that Cardinal Law IS an enabler of the worst kind. In fact, I think he is more guilty than any one perpetrator as his actions/lack thereof, have enabled many perpetrators.
All he ever had to do was to ask himself "What would Jesus do?"