Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Careers are 'making women miserable'
Daily Telegraph ^ | April 25, 2002 | Paul Stokes

Posted on 04/26/2002 9:12:13 AM PDT by Korth

WOMEN have become unhappier as a result of concentrating more on their careers than the family role they once fulfilled, an academic claims in a new book.

Prof James Tooley believes the feminist revolution of the 1960s and 1970s brought about huge changes in attitudes which have not be conducive to motherhood.

In his book, The Miseducation of Women, published next month, he suggests many professional woman would have been more contented by staying at home and bringing up children.

He draws comparisons with the film character Bridget Jones, a love-hungry young woman in publishing who becomes a television presenter and craves a stable relationship rather than being left "a singleton".

Prof Tooley, professor of education policy at Newcastle University, considers that the role of housewife has been "desperately undervalued" in society.

He argues that schools should allow girls to concentrate on the arts and domestic science rather than being pushed towards subjects such as engineering and computer science in an attempt at sexual equality.

Prof Tooley, 42, who is single with no children, said yesterday: "The Bridget Jones effect is growing in society. Women find themselves successful in their careers and unhappy in their lives.

Domesticity has been degraded over the year, particularly by feminists in the 1970s who used the phrases 'parasite' and `leach' to describe the housewife.

"I expect career women will react very strongly against me and to even suggest women would be happier in the home has become almost a taboo. We need to cull a few sacred cows and start a debate on the subject. That is what I am trying to do."

He describes his book as "largely a think piece", based on a study of more than 100,000 men and women in Britain and America by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Its findings led him to examine the way the education system was shaping the way women lead their lives.

Among his assertions are that women who were pushed into science as pupils and embarked on careers such as law and accountancy are unhappy by the time they reach 30.

Prof Tooley, from Rothbury, Northumblerland, said: "I'm not suggesting we ban girls from the labs, but my research shows that 30 per cent of young women are unhappier with their lives than previous generations were, while young men now seem happier than previous generations were."

Prof Tooley believes the "Bridget Jones generation" was spawned by the feminist revolution.

"Feminists went right to what they thought was the root of the problem. They looked at schooling to change the situation. The Sex Discrimination Act of 1975 and the introduction of the National Curriculum in 1988 are, in a way, products of that, and they've transformed what is taught in school.

"But this means that the curriculum is now designed according to the feminist idea that girls should be following the model that was set down for boys. That is, pursuing a career at the expense of all other things.

"I suggest that this is pushing girls in a direction they don't want to take and there's a whole generation of working women who don't want to be there."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: feminism; marriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last
To: Surfin,Wardaddy
I note of late that some guys on freerepublic seem to see the world in black and white and seem to think they know the RIGHT WAY TO LIVE. Now we agree on alot and I have my opinions on these things, i.e. women are smart to get married young {told my daughters that college is a buffet of husbands and they better get the best ones first}, alot of sexual partners are unwise, staying home with kids is the best investment you ever make, never live so that you have to work, hold off on career till kids are older and go full steam after they leave so college bills can be paid, find something you can do to support yourself is hubby dies or goes nuts, don't let women or men demean you for being a mother and wife, etc. Nevertheless, people live their lives by their views, not mine. I personally think television has created a consumer society thus necessitating two earner families to support the spending. That has all but destroyed family life and made people just nuts. I don't think feminazis did it,,I think they were used by the people who make money by all of us working and spending and wanting more and more things. The feminazis are tools.
141 posted on 04/26/2002 8:33:46 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Korth
Success in a man is attractive to women. The more the success, the greater the attraction.

Successful women have made the assumption (projection, I suppose) that men will be as attracted by their success as they are by our success.

But it's not true.

It is false, I think, that we are "turned off" by success in a woman-it just isn't any big deal, whereas to mate-seeking women, it's everything.

Just my 2 cents.

142 posted on 04/26/2002 8:39:40 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allthingsnew
That's beautiful, thanks.
143 posted on 04/26/2002 9:44:30 PM PDT by Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Intimidator
"I think the majority of women who work and are unhappy is because their sorry a$$ husbands don't do any of the housework. Thats why its so hectic. My wife is a schoolteacher in a Christian school and she would be very miserable if I didn't do all the laundry, help with cleaning, and do half the cooking."

Uh..ok, whatever you say Gloria Bunker :)

144 posted on 04/27/2002 7:36:18 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: glory
you are correct in assuming the later, however, most men in the age range of 35-50 EXPECT that the wife works (with or without kids). If she wants to stay at home to raise the kids or be a homemaker, she is ostracized as lazy. the women's movement with it's violent pendulum swing is mostly to blame there.

BTW as for being bitter. . . honey, if you've been through what i've been through, you'd be a tad acerbic yourself!

if i choose to tell my life story to people, they come away gasping and questioning to themselves "gee, i thought the straight and narrow route always worked out in the end?"

one thing i know: in life there are definitely no guarantees; and implied contracts stand on weak ground.

145 posted on 04/27/2002 7:53:04 AM PDT by bandlength
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Maven
good luck to you.
146 posted on 04/27/2002 7:54:42 AM PDT by bandlength
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
HAH!!! Good save, wardaddy.
147 posted on 04/27/2002 8:47:42 AM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Doesn't sound like you're so sexist after all. :-)
148 posted on 04/27/2002 8:49:23 AM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
...they want it all and they wait too late to start with babies or a man. This myth has been cruel and disastrous. Just my view.

In some cases, I think this is true. But I have a lot of professional, 30-ish girlfriends who would like nothing better than to settle down with a family...but they can't seem to find a good husband. It makes me feel very fortunate to have met my wonderful hubby at 26...

149 posted on 04/27/2002 8:59:13 AM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
I was just having fun.
150 posted on 04/27/2002 9:47:52 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
You really don't get it, I don't care what you think about the label, I care what the young women growing up think about homemaking and those who seek to destroy homes and make all women wage slaves, succeed each time they can demean those who decide to follow the high calling of making a home. And you help their agenda each time you call yourself a 'stay at home' Mom, they chose that term carefully, just as they call liberals "progressives", words are powerful tools and naming things is half their battle. All I'm saying is quit helping them win!
151 posted on 04/27/2002 10:13:20 AM PDT by Mahone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Mahone
I care what the young women growing up think about homemaking

Let me clue you into something. There are two little girls in my home even as I type this who will believe it to be a wonderful thing to do, regardless of your flipping out over a silly label. Do you really think that calling me a 'Homemaker' as opposed to a 'Stay at Home Mom' is going to change young women's views on whether or not to do it? That is one of the silliest things I have ever heard. Children are either raised to believe it is a worthwhile place in life to make a home and raise a family or they're not. You and your labels are never going to change that.

152 posted on 04/27/2002 10:18:56 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Thanks....good for you and Good Luck on a long and happy marriage. You're right...there are a lot of not so good men....it's a two sided equation.

I think a lot of folks are still sort of confused even a couple of generations after we threw the baby out with the bath water....sexual mores speaking. I think a lot of younger girls are probably more like their grandmothers than their mothers. They seem to have learned from watching. My generation...born in '57...bought the whole bill of goods...some(men and women) didn't figure it out till later...too late for some.

The main thing having children does from my perspective is that it forces one to live outside oneself. That's hard to quantify.

regards

153 posted on 04/27/2002 10:32:38 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: galt-jw
Don't be so certain. The misery of people has never stopped a movement that is based on the acquisition of power.
154 posted on 04/27/2002 10:36:48 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Korth
I said this 15 years ago, but who would listen to me? I was just a stay-at-home mommy. If you want someone to pay attention you have to be a professional.
155 posted on 04/27/2002 11:19:06 AM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
I haven't read or watched Bridget Jones -- it doesn't appeal to me at all. A professor who uses a silly fictional character as the basis for a serious study is lazy and bankrupt of original thought.
156 posted on 04/27/2002 11:24:24 AM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: bandlength
Thank you for making that point. Those of us who are divorced, work full-time, and are single parents are no less committed to raising our children right and family values than those who are blessed with circumstances that allow them to stay home.
157 posted on 04/27/2002 11:54:15 AM PDT by kaybee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: olivia2boys
"Is it weird to think that whoever brings home the least amount of bacon should do more of the housework?"

To the landscaper who earns $900 per week for 60 hours work married to the newspaper columnist who earns $2500 per week and works at home for 30 hours - yes, it would be weird.

It doesn't pay to generalize.

158 posted on 04/27/2002 1:41:10 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
"It is false, I think, that we are "turned off" by success in a woman..."

I don't think that's exactly the case. I think we're simply not turned on by women who are "successful" in the traditionally male sense of the word. Just as women are sexually attracted to men who can provide well for children, men are sexually attracted to women who appear to be fertile and healthy. In the basest terms, women look for a big wallet, men look for big.... well.... you know.

It might sound creepy to the politikally korrekt, but it's worked for a hundred thousand years or so.

159 posted on 04/27/2002 1:52:34 PM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
>>I think we're simply not turned on by women who are "successful" in the traditionally male sense of the word. Just as women are sexually attracted to men who can provide well for children, men are sexually attracted to women who appear to be fertile and healthy<<

Isnt't that what I said?

160 posted on 04/27/2002 4:09:33 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson