Skip to comments.
Kristol: Our Saudi Friends
The Weekly Standard ^
| 04/25/2002
| William Kristol
Posted on 04/25/2002 3:15:26 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
1
posted on
04/25/2002 3:15:26 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Miss marple
Billy Boy has diarrhea of the mouth again.
2
posted on
04/25/2002 3:16:34 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Is Saudi Arabia with us or the terrorists? Neither. They are the terrorists.
To: Pokey78;Miss Marple
Jane your take on this????
4
posted on
04/25/2002 3:21:49 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Pokey78
Now my assumption that the "source close to the Saudis and familiar with how they think" (in the New York Times) was Bill Kristol doesn't look so silly, does it?
I am getting pretty wise to his machinations.
To: Pokey78
Utilize the base to seize their oil, destroy the House of Saud, driving this "royalty" into crippling, abject poverty. Free their country. Liberate their women. Field candidates. Insure elections.
Dammit, this should really be the end....
6
posted on
04/25/2002 3:27:46 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
And seize their assests abroad.
To: Dog
Always remember, Kristol doesn't have the best interests of the Bush administration in mind. He ALWAYS promotes the most belligerent (if emotionally satisfying) option, usually one that would be destructive to the Republican party, even if it damages the nation. I thought his fingerprints were all over that NYT article this morning, and I believe I am right.
Kristol would love for the relationship with the Saudis to collapse. He could then rail about how terible Bush's foreign policy is.
My best advice is to ignore Kristol.
To: Pokey78
Points to Mr. Kristol. He needs them. Somebody ought to tell that bloated malefluence of a 'prince' that he really does not want to push George too far. There are several million conservative Americans who think Saudi Arabia IS THE problem. Personally I think we should invade the shit hole and confiscate two thirds of their oil as war reparations. They owe us at least three trillion dollars for the damage done by their son OBL and his fifteen hijacker followers.
Jump their asses George. Millions of Americans will love you for it.
9
posted on
04/25/2002 3:33:16 PM PDT
by
mercy
To: All
I have a simple question -- should not Saudis pay for damages caused by terrorist attacks on 9/11? If not them, then who else?
10
posted on
04/25/2002 3:59:05 PM PDT
by
chukcha
To: Pokey78
Kristol never met an Israel cause that did not turn him on, American interests notwithstanding.
11
posted on
04/25/2002 4:13:08 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
To: ex-snook
What "American interests" would have us endorsing this islamist death-cult?
12
posted on
04/25/2002 4:35:41 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Miss Marple
"My best advice is to ignore Kristol." However, a broken clock is correct twice a day.
13
posted on
04/25/2002 4:42:26 PM PDT
by
lormand
To: Pokey78
Can 1000 corrupt cousins possibly right? The 1000 cousins make Hitler look positively enlightened.
To: lormand
Kristol is a broken cheap electric digital watch. They are never right! He is never right! He is a rat/mole who constantly tries to get Republicans in office to do stupid things to lose elections. Remember all of his great wisdom on the war in Afghanistan before and after it started. When it was obvious that he was wrong for months, he sent a letter to GW congratulating him for doing the right thing while claiming credit for what was done. He is a petty little POS rat/mole!
To: Pokey78
In the East, especially in the fevered diplomacy and accompanying preparations for war, nothing is as it seems. How do we know Abdulla isn't blustering and threatening on the outside and with coordination with W and at the ranch saying hey what must I do to survive? Wars are more cheaply won by show and misdirection than by just marching your army up to the city wall.
16
posted on
04/25/2002 4:57:04 PM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Miss Marple;pokey78
Now you can't possibly think that the Saudis are our friends?
Our eventual goal should be to destabilize the House of Saud.
To: GuillermoX
No, I don't think the Saudis are our friends, other than the interest they have in getting our money for their oil. I doubt that Bush and his people think any differently.
Kristol's agitation and sniping are not helpful to the situation, however. He is attempting to divide the Republican base and bring disaster to the Bush administration. That is his sole goal in life.
De-stabilizing the Saudi regime would not be in America's interest at this time. The most likely successor to the House of Saud would be an Islamic fanatic regime, and this would not be a good thing. We need less of those types of governments in the world, not more.
To: Grampa Dave
"He is a petty little POS rat/mole!" You are going too easy on him Gramps! :)
POS....I like that acronym
19
posted on
04/25/2002 5:07:56 PM PDT
by
lormand
To: Miss Marple
I thought his fingerprints were all over that NYT article this morning, and I believe I am right. There are medications to cure this type of delusion.
Is the fact that the NY Times is against Kristol's policies are some kind of cover for the machinations, or were you just wrong?
Is it possible that he Saudi's released teh story to get the American intelligensia to pressure Bush to cave? I think that is more likely than your conspiracy.
20
posted on
04/25/2002 5:12:08 PM PDT
by
rmlew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson