Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog
Always remember, Kristol doesn't have the best interests of the Bush administration in mind. He ALWAYS promotes the most belligerent (if emotionally satisfying) option, usually one that would be destructive to the Republican party, even if it damages the nation. I thought his fingerprints were all over that NYT article this morning, and I believe I am right.

Kristol would love for the relationship with the Saudis to collapse. He could then rail about how terible Bush's foreign policy is.

My best advice is to ignore Kristol.

8 posted on 04/25/2002 3:31:26 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
"My best advice is to ignore Kristol."

However, a broken clock is correct twice a day.

13 posted on 04/25/2002 4:42:26 PM PDT by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple;pokey78
Now you can't possibly think that the Saudis are our friends?

Our eventual goal should be to destabilize the House of Saud.

17 posted on 04/25/2002 4:58:43 PM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
I thought his fingerprints were all over that NYT article this morning, and I believe I am right.

There are medications to cure this type of delusion.
Is the fact that the NY Times is against Kristol's policies are some kind of cover for the machinations, or were you just wrong?

Is it possible that he Saudi's released teh story to get the American intelligensia to pressure Bush to cave? I think that is more likely than your conspiracy.

20 posted on 04/25/2002 5:12:08 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson