Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: d4now
Too bad Barrick is so highly hedged.

Doesn't matter, Barrick's hedge contracts can be rolled forward and half of production is not hedged. Hedging was great for Barrick when the rest of the mining companies were getting market prices for gold, Barrick was making over $300 million a year just from their hedge premium.

7 posted on 04/25/2002 9:20:19 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Cuttnhorse
Time will tell whether it matters or not.

All things considered I'll take unhedged. (with the exception of DROOY)

8 posted on 04/25/2002 9:42:23 AM PDT by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Cuttnhorse;d4now
I'm with D4now on Barrick:

(Barry Cooper at CIBC World Markets in Toronto on 4/23)

Investors, says Cooper, are voting with their dollars, preferring to buy shares of the world's largest unhedged producers, Denver's Newmont Mining and South Africa's Gold Fields, as opposed to their hedged counterparts.

"Investors just don't want to be stuck with a hedged position if gold rallies strongly," he said.

Indeed, shares of unhedged producers have outpaced by a wide margin those that hedge by forward-selling their gold. Shares of Gold Fields, South Africa's second largest gold miner, are up 145 percent. The company has no hedge book. In contrast, shares of hedger Placer Dome have risen 13 percent and Barrick Gold is up just 16 percent.

12 posted on 04/25/2002 11:24:53 AM PDT by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson