Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Saundra Duffy
Any woman who would kill her baby doesn't needs breasts! They are to nourish her infant babies with. If a woman gets cancer from the result of a selected murder then I do hope she suffers many, many years of radiation treatment, surgery and mental anguish. Sympathy does NOT come from this man when it concerns abuse or death of your own child.
20 posted on 04/24/2002 8:42:18 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: B4Ranch
Any woman who would kill her baby doesn't needs breasts!

GOOD POINT!

22 posted on 04/24/2002 8:43:54 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
hmmm..I understand your passion on this sensitive subject. Perhaps you could consider the woman who has aborted but changed her life afterwards, still experiences the outcome of abortion to her own body and accepts it..but her heart is changed completely..and forgiven. Would that lend a certain kindness toward such a woman?
24 posted on 04/24/2002 8:45:37 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
Oh, B4, be careful. You can't believe any woman would kill her own children. Remember, we're living in the last days, pal. Women who have had abortions are to be pitied, not judged so harshly. You are right to be outraged but have mercy on these women; they know not what they do. For victory & freedom!!!
37 posted on 04/24/2002 9:04:30 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
If a woman gets cancer from the result of a selected murder then I do hope she suffers many, many years of radiation treatment, surgery and mental anguish.

What a pity.

MANY pro-life supporters are women who have had abortions themselves. Should they all get breast cancer and die? Many of them were deliberately misinformed by the pro-abortion propaganda that persuaded them their babies were not babies yet and that it was "okay" to end a pregnancy that hadn't "really started" yet...Many of them were very young. Only later did they realize the magnitude of what they had done and the scope of the lies they'd believed.

No woman "deserves" breast cancer.

This kind of harshness keeps many suffering women silent when their hearts long to cry out and warn other women against the choice they themselves made in the face of enormous misinformation. The abortion industry WANTS us to ignore or vilify these women and keep the abortion/breast cancer research out of the spotlight. If pro-life people can be counted on to say that women who have had abortions DESERVE breast cancer, this takes the abortion industry off the hook. If WE shame these women, we take a weapon out of our own arsenal to use against those who would still claim abortion is a harmless procedure.

A better approach would be one of forgiveness toward these often heartbroken women and a hope that by reaching out to them, their painful stories will come out, loud and clear. A woman who has had an abortion has first-hand knowledge of the evil it actually is. A woman who has had an abortion and later develops breast cancer has an even greater knowledge and even more reason to argue against the pro-abortionists. Should they be shut out and their voices extinguished?

Perhaps when these one-time pro-choice women are encouraged to raise their voices with pro-life advocates, their combined shouts may finally drown out the noisy call for "reproductive rights". Romans 5:8 "But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us."

58 posted on 04/24/2002 9:46:52 AM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson