Posted on 04/18/2002 6:15:19 AM PDT by Caipirabob
Sometimes you make it too easy to make a joke of it.
I got so involved in writing a script I forgot to take a lunch, until now. Thanks for the ping. Bump.
Bring on the vigilantes!
Do you believe a homosexual has the right to inflict their beliefs upon an innocent child when those beliefs are completely contrary to those by which the childs parents have raised the child by?
Come on...be specific...the world is waiting...
Why are you flagging others? Is this a gang-up?
Not really, it's just that the word has gone out and the activists are gathering to counter the threat that is perceived against our children. The bond between parent and child is something that no one should come between. It could become uncomfortable for the offender.
Now that they are trying to teach something we find abhorrent to children in a public tax subsidzed forum, I have plenty to say about it.
We will not surrender our children to the likes of GLSEN.
Now that they are trying to teach something we find abhorrent to children in a public tax subsidzed forum, I have plenty to say about it.
We will not surrender our children to the likes of GLSEN.
Yeah, I do think it's "sacred." I think sex and orgasm is mystical and approaches "God."
While I have always considered sex and the attraction of the sexes to be indeed one of the greatest attributes of God's Creation, what you have been trying to justify in this thread is not sex, is not sacred, and if anything is a complete mockery of the dynamics of Creation. If it approaches God, it is with something very far from respect for his Natural Order!
The term sex refers to the division of a species into two sexes. It does not make any sense to use the term to refer to any of the muscular activities that some deviants use to simulate some of the feelings that men and women cause in one another, while yielding to the natural attraction between the sexes. That natural attraction leads to mating and procreation. The simulation leads nowhere, and is offensive to most religious people.
The idea of promoting acceptance of the deviant alternatives to sex as an "alternative lifestyle" or as acceptable behavior in a public school system, should offend even those with the tendencies being considered as "alternative." Certainly a modicum of objectivity, should convince anyone that his or her questionable practices are not something that should be shouted from the rooftops, nor encouraged in public schools funded by taxpayers of a very wide divergence of beliefs.
To offer even a comparatively mild analogy: Because I have had too much to drink on an occasion, does not make me want to encourage drunkenness in the public schools. Because I have driven a car too fast, does not make me want to encourage speeding. Nor am I such an ego maniac that I would presume to advocate every action that I have ever taken with a young lady, be taught as correct procedures in such a school. Indeed, quite the contrary. As a gentleman, it ill behooves me ever to discuss anything I do with any lady.
Why do those who engage in clearly deviant behavior seek a higher level of exhibitionism/or acceptance for that which disgusts most others, than those others would ever ask for their own more accepted behavior?
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Shhh! Don't let GLSEN know or you'll be on their Most Wanted List.
And you certainly do not have the right to ask a public school to teach little children to not be offended, either!
We don't see our sexuality as the same as drinking or speeding. If they are, then we are "drunk" and "speeding" all the time, every moment.
I don't see it as the equivalent either. I was using a very mild analogy. Being drunk or speeding are failures, of a sort. But they do not pervert the very purpose of human action. They involve a yielding, but not a mockery. What you call your "sexuality," mocks real sexuality, which as I noted originally refers to the division of the species into two distinct sexes, each necessary to complete the other.
Put another way, the quest for sex is supposed to be a quest for completion. With what you suggest, there is only a muscular simulation of things that happen as part of a much broader reality between the sexes. The one yields new life, the other nothing at all. You cannot expect others to ever accept such as normal. Be grateful that you live in a land which respects your closed door, and stop trying to undermine your neighbors' family values.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.