Skip to comments.
Uncommon Knowledge: Tale Of Two Decades
Uncommon Knowledge ^
| 4/15/2002
| Hoover Institute
Posted on 04/15/2002 9:01:26 PM PDT by jodorowsky
Peter Robinson: Welcome to Uncommon Knowledge. I'm Peter Robinson. Our show today, the last two decades of the twentieth century. The '80s and the '90s were both dominated by two term presidents and both enjoyed long, economic expansions yet the two decades are on something of teeter-totter, those who liked the '80s under Reagan tend to dislike the '90s under Clinton while those who liked the '90s under Clinton tend to think of the '80s under Reagan as the greed decade. How come? Joining us today, two guests.
P.J. O'Rourke is the best-selling humorist. His most recent book is entitled, The CEO of the Sofa.
Haynes Johnson is a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist. His most recent book is entitled, The Best of Times, America in the Clinton Years.
Real/WinMedia and transcript here
TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
To: jodorowsky
Oops... I didn't mean for this to show up in the sidebar.
To: jodorowsky
As I recall, during the Reagan years, more people moved from poverty level to middle class than at any other time in history. However, during the Clinton years, the difference between the wealthy and every one else grew.
Big PJ BUMP!
4
posted on
04/15/2002 9:24:15 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: jodorowsky
pj bttt
5
posted on
04/15/2002 9:41:19 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: jodorowsky
Haynes Johnson: ..human beings--most of them are like me in the mushy middleJohnson's mushy, but he's not in the middle. It s just amzing how much the guy tries to spin Clinton into being some kind of deep person. O'Roarke, on the other hand seems to speak more directly and, with such cutting humor.. IMO
To: Nonstatist
Haynes Johnson: Yeah, I mean, it's a part of our history and part of our time. We all saw it. I mean, saw it more than we wanted to see it and so forth, so on. But that he (Clinton) won because women, minorities and across the board,
saw in him something that wasn't this ideological construct that he was not a good person, a despicable person, that he maybe understood what the needs were in these groups. And the Republicans didn't get that. They really didn't get that. And I don't think they still get it today.
Shudder...
O'Rourke's explanation of positive and negative rights around the 20 minute mark is very good. But it's better experienced in RealMedia than as a transcript...
To: jodorowsky
I haven't listened to this one yet -- it's cued up -- but I've always thought if Haynes Johnson as one of the greatest mediocrities around.
Gotta love PJ though.
8
posted on
04/15/2002 11:34:59 PM PDT
by
Harp
To: jodorowsky
OMG, Haynes is a moron. The best he could do with the PJ's unremarkable categories for rights (positive "gimme" rights / and negative "hands off" rights) was to say something about it being in "black and white terms." Laughable.
9
posted on
04/15/2002 11:57:29 PM PDT
by
Harp
To: jodorowsky
Any relation to El Topo? One of my all-time favorite movies.
10
posted on
04/16/2002 10:54:34 AM PDT
by
lds23
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson