Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wraith
1) Walker's statement isn't evidence in the matter of who murdered the people at Racak.
2) If true, doesn't bear directly on who murdered the people at Racak, and each side's stopping a patrol renders it inconclusive circumstantial evidence.
3) The OSCE field reports don't bear directly on who murdered the people at Racak, the EU-FET report does.

Also, Ranta's team produced 1428 pages of report on the autopsy results on the 17th of March, 1999, and then an additional 194 page supplementary report on the 21st of June, 2000, which covered the subsequent crime scene investigation which had been blocked by the Serbs while they were in control of Kosovo.

The initial report refuted the Serb claims of KLA uniforms and combatant status.
The supplementary report proved that the men were shot in place, vindicating Ranta's initial claims on the matter.

So you're racking up tons of useless points here - how about racking up some points for actual facts pertinent to your claims of KLA manipulation of the bodies?

86 posted on 04/29/2002 4:47:44 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Hoplite
Here, I'll help you: Start off your response with "The reasons Ranta's report are flawed are..."

Ranta (The denist) didn't write any report, all she did is grandstand in fron to the press and evidently got kicked off the team for doing so. The actual Report was written by two other members of the Finnish team.......their findings are essentially in agreement with the other 2 forensic teams findings.

as for tampering with the crime scene.......the KLA wouldn't even let a Albanian Judge visit the place in order to reconstruct what happened.....

87 posted on 04/29/2002 5:38:58 PM PDT by vooch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: Hoplite;vooch;Wonders
1) Walker's statement isn't evidence in the matter of who murdered the people at Racak. 2) If true, doesn't bear directly on who murdered the people at Racak, and each side's stopping a patrol renders it inconclusive circumstantial evidence. 3) The OSCE field reports don't bear directly on who murdered the people at Racak, the EU-FET report does.

1) Walker's statements i.e prematurely condemning the Serbs for the so called Racak massacre While the U.N. to this day has not declared which side is suspect is an obvious flag pointing to a cover-up that they do not want to be involved with if they want to maintain their reputaion.

2) The UCK preventing that OSCE KVM patrol from going to RACAK i.e. to witness and prevent any atrocities points to the UCK needing time to evacuate their known dead UCK fighters (11)(Fact) so to sanitize Racak leaving only the dead villagers/props for the media to find. A very obvious cover up scenario. Walker was waiting for this.

3) Walker the head of the OSCE mission in Kosovo was routinely reporting to General Clark ( Clarks Admission to BBC) and to Madlaine Albright ( Albright admitted routine contact with Walker as well)while Wild Willie Walker lied to the BBC saying he had no contact with the previous right up until the Racak incident in an attempt to portray himself and his position with the OSCE Mission in Kosovo as be non conflicting. Why the lies Hoplight. Simply points to a cover up.

4) Walker the head of the OSCE mission in Kosovo and recent media reports have indicated that former OSCE KVM people have come forward and stated that their field reports were being altered? Again I had heard this in Kosovo back in 1999 from a former OSCE KVM member and have posted this on FR. Walker's the boss who was manipulating information published by the OSCE. To ensure the cover up. OSCE was paying the bill and I wonder where the money came form.

5) A lot of controversy linked to Walker who is the common denominator Hoplit and is not based on speculation but facts. So why all this SO THAT NATO COULD HAVE AN EXCUSE TO INVADE KOSOVO!!!!!! The BAY OF TONKIN WAS THE SAME THING so the US could have public support for getting involved in the Vietnam conflict.

6) Ranta an experienced Forensic examiner failed to conduct a very basic test, the test to identify traces of gun powder residue on the bodies. The first test to be done in any shooting incident. Ranta and friends reek of incompetence or were manipulated. Why not the test which simply equals support of the cover up.

7) As far as who killed the Racak Villager I believe they died defending their village which is why did they not evacuate before the Serbs came . The UCK we know had 11 dead and in knowing the UCK FIRST HAND these villagers were forced to defend Racak thats why the majority were men and LDK supporters. Fodder for Thaci. The US backed UCK set the stage for Walker to point the finger.

I'm sure you will be a bone head and ask me for the smoking gun, the signed documents etc in the name of convincing you and why Ranta and her friends are the only credible thing. Don't look at the one thing but all of them but I know you will continue to be a bone head.

88 posted on 04/30/2002 6:51:42 AM PDT by Wraith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson