1) Walker's statements i.e prematurely condemning the Serbs for the so called Racak massacre While the U.N. to this day has not declared which side is suspect is an obvious flag pointing to a cover-up that they do not want to be involved with if they want to maintain their reputaion.
2) The UCK preventing that OSCE KVM patrol from going to RACAK i.e. to witness and prevent any atrocities points to the UCK needing time to evacuate their known dead UCK fighters (11)(Fact) so to sanitize Racak leaving only the dead villagers/props for the media to find. A very obvious cover up scenario. Walker was waiting for this.
3) Walker the head of the OSCE mission in Kosovo was routinely reporting to General Clark ( Clarks Admission to BBC) and to Madlaine Albright ( Albright admitted routine contact with Walker as well)while Wild Willie Walker lied to the BBC saying he had no contact with the previous right up until the Racak incident in an attempt to portray himself and his position with the OSCE Mission in Kosovo as be non conflicting. Why the lies Hoplight. Simply points to a cover up.
4) Walker the head of the OSCE mission in Kosovo and recent media reports have indicated that former OSCE KVM people have come forward and stated that their field reports were being altered? Again I had heard this in Kosovo back in 1999 from a former OSCE KVM member and have posted this on FR. Walker's the boss who was manipulating information published by the OSCE. To ensure the cover up. OSCE was paying the bill and I wonder where the money came form.
5) A lot of controversy linked to Walker who is the common denominator Hoplit and is not based on speculation but facts. So why all this SO THAT NATO COULD HAVE AN EXCUSE TO INVADE KOSOVO!!!!!! The BAY OF TONKIN WAS THE SAME THING so the US could have public support for getting involved in the Vietnam conflict.
6) Ranta an experienced Forensic examiner failed to conduct a very basic test, the test to identify traces of gun powder residue on the bodies. The first test to be done in any shooting incident. Ranta and friends reek of incompetence or were manipulated. Why not the test which simply equals support of the cover up.
7) As far as who killed the Racak Villager I believe they died defending their village which is why did they not evacuate before the Serbs came . The UCK we know had 11 dead and in knowing the UCK FIRST HAND these villagers were forced to defend Racak thats why the majority were men and LDK supporters. Fodder for Thaci. The US backed UCK set the stage for Walker to point the finger.
I'm sure you will be a bone head and ask me for the smoking gun, the signed documents etc in the name of convincing you and why Ranta and her friends are the only credible thing. Don't look at the one thing but all of them but I know you will continue to be a bone head.
2. The UCK, per you, were blocking the KVM from entering the village at exactly the same time the Serbs were in the village themselves and were blocking KVM personnel from entering the village.
So what are you suggesting? The Serbs surround Racak, but leave a road unguarded where the KLA place a roadblock in order to stop the KVM from entering the village to witness KLA activities in areas of the village which the Serbs didn’t enter?
Ridiculous.
3, 4, and 5. Again, simply not pertinent to your claims of KLA manipulation of the evidence.
6. Incorrect. The Serbs used the outdated paraffin test, as was noted by the Finns. The Finns used the SEM-EDX method. Please do some basic research and develop a baseline knowledge yourself before presuming to speak of other's competence.
"I believe"
And you do so without any supporting evidence beyond a stopped KVM patrol and repeated concerns about the veracity of William Walker, who’s statement isn’t central to the evidence in the matter.
In short, Wraith, we’ve just spent a week getting down to the nuts and bolts of your case, and there ain’t a whole lot of anything there – is there.