[GovernmentShrinker]

Huh? Read the descriptions of the two fathers of her children. The first one isn't likely to give any boost to her financial situation whether he's married to her or not, since he's in prison half the time, and presumably isn't holding good jobs in between prison stints. The other one was already married to someone else when he fathered children by her. Which one of these losers do you suggest the federal government should use OUR tax dollars to bribe into "marrying" her?

[Rightwing Canuck]

Huh? Read the descriptions of the two fathers of her children. The first one isn't likely to give any boost to her financial situation whether he's married to her or not, since he's in prison half the time, and presumably isn't holding good jobs in between prison stints. The other one was already married to someone else when he fathered children by her. Which one of these losers do you suggest the federal government should use OUR tax dollars to bribe into "marrying" her?

Neither. I was referring to the article implying she was on welfare, and being happy. She shouldn't marry either of them, and she shouldn't be on welfare either. No one should.

[Don Myers]

"Which one of these losers do you suggest the federal government should use OUR tax dollars to bribe into "marrying" her?"

Actually, you are right. It would just be another marriage made in Hell. Lets just cut off her welfare.