Replies

Huh? Read the descriptions of the two fathers of her children. The first one isn't likely to give any boost to her financial situation whether he's married to her or not, since he's in prison half the time, and presumably isn't holding good jobs in between prison stints. The other one was already married to someone else when he fathered children by her. Which one of these losers do you suggest the federal government should use OUR tax dollars to bribe into "marrying" her?

Neither. I was referring to the article implying she was on welfare, and being happy. She shouldn't marry either of them, and she shouldn't be on welfare either. No one should.

I quite agree that no one should be on welfare and happy about it. That's why I'm alarmed at proposals to create yet another taxpayer-funded entitlement which will end up subsidizing destructive behavior. And I'm even more alarmed about the level of acceptance on FR of this new scheme. If freepers won't oppose another expensive, ineffective, government-run social engineering program, who will?