Posted on 04/09/2002 5:15:38 AM PDT by mikeb704
I don’t care how long it’s been since Clinton dragged his sorry carcass – and anything else he could swipe – out of the White House. I don’t want to forget the Clinton years. I don’t want to move on. I don’t want to put it all behind me.
I hate Clinton as ardently now as when he energetically defiled the Nation on a daily basis. I hate his wife, and his daughter, too. And I won’t be satisfied until everyone hates them as much as I do.
That, you may argue, isn’t feasible, despite the multitude of excellent reasons to hate them. My answer is that in a country that could elect a deceitful sleaze like Clinton, anything is possible.
For years I gave Chelsea a pass. After all, it wasn’t her fault that she was born into a family of crooks. She’s grown up now, though, and is her own person. So what did she do immediately after the terrorist attacks of September 11th? She’s written that she was "expounding on the detriments of Bush’s tax cut as we approached Grand Central Terminal . . ." Quite clearly, she’s a developing basket case, one deserving the same scorn and derision as the unfit parents who inculcated her with socialist nonsense.
What’s especially preposterous are Clinton’s incessant attempts to rewrite history. A few months ago he rounded up some of his bootlicking apologists and urged them to publicize all his supposed accomplishments as president. More recently, he permitted the Monica Lewinsky of newsmagazines, Newsweek, to interview him. Clinton claimed that giving Marc Rich, former regular on the FBI’s Top Ten Most Wanted List, was a mistake because – hold your breath here – "It wasn’t worth the damage to my reputation."
His reputation? His reputation? What a knee lapper. Clinton’s got a reputation, all right. But it’s certainly not one that could be damaged. Here’s a guy who was:
Fined $90,000 for lying under oath and obstructing justice. Forced to pay an $850,000 settlement in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Disbarred in Arkansas. Prohibited from practicing law before the U.S. Supreme Court.
He ran the White House like a Motel 6 for Democrat fat cats. He took campaign contributions from Chinese communists. He entertained felons, including drug peddlers and arms smugglers, in the Executive Mansion.
Remember how the Clintons managed to get their hands on 900 FBI files they weren’t supposed to have? Or the puzzling reappearance of subpoenaed billing records?
Then there were the last minute pardons. Susan McDougal, Roger Clinton, and Clinton’s former secretary of Housing and Urban Development were pardoned. So were Weather Underground radicals, murderers, drug dealers, and a bunch of folks who stole tax dollars. Hillary’s brothers, seeing how well Roger Clinton was doing by peddling influence, jumped on the pardon bandwagon themselves.
And what of Clinton and terrorism? In 1993 bin Laden’s thugs exploded a bomb in the World Trade Center, killing six and injuring hundreds of others. In 1995 they bombed a military headquarters in Riyatdh, Saudi Arabia and killed five Americans. In 1996 they bombed military barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia and killed 19 Americans. In 1998 they bombed U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and killed 224 people, including 12 Americans, and injured more than 5,000 others. In 2000 they bombed the U.S.S. Cole and killed 17 Americans. What did Clinton do about all this? Not much. He was too busy lying, obstructing, denying, obfuscating, stonewalling, and, of course, traveling.
Clinton whines about how much money has been spent on investigating him. But how much would have been spent if he had only told the truth?
So much to hate, so little time. Yet there’s reason to think that finally, finally, more Americans are recognizing the true Clinton legacy.
A recent Gallup poll rated the last eight presidents in terms of job approval. In the poll, the first one taken since he left office, Clinton ranked sixth, ahead of only Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon.
Not bad for a start. In the meantime, let the hating continue.
LOL! You mean they actually ask you to subscribe just so you can tear up their magazine??
It is not possible not to acknowledge that Clinton was a corrupt liar and still be considered a rational human being: those who defend Clinton fall into a very few categories (i) those who would tolerate anything, including rape, because he defends the feminist agenda or is the first "black president", (ii) those who personally profited from the corruption of his regime, (iii) those who do not believe in government of laws, not men, (iv) those who hate America and support our enemies or (v) the terminally stupid. Which category or categories cover you?
13 posted on 4/9/02 5:51 AM Pacific by chicago charlie
The proof was there,Ray just ignored it and weaseled around it.
From his own lips, Ray stated that hillary,"Gave factually untrue testimony".
That is perjury by any other name.
As for bill, Ray weaseled around indicing him by saying something to the effect of since he admitted giving untrue and misleading testimony [perjury to anyone else] all would be forgiven.
If any other Freepers can recall Ray's exact words, please feel free to chime in.
When bill and hillary too for that matter get to hell they will have apologists there already defending them to Satan.
The only thing worse than the clintons are their apologists and aiders and abetors, for without them they could not operate and corrupt anything and everything that they come into contact with.
Horsepoop.
Had the "injustice" department been run by someone other than a 'rat lesbian shill, or a 'nadless Rino more interested in "moving on" than in justice, say somebody like David Schippers, your buddy Klintoon would have been executed by firing squad for treason already.
Oh, BTW about Chelsea. "As the twig is bent, so grows the tree".
She is a combination of the both of them; and that's a frightening prospect.
sw
A prestidigitator is one skilled in legerdemain or sleight of hand; a juggler [legerdemain means sleight of hand...or... any artful deception or trick
A mountebank is 1. One who mounts a bench or stage in teh market or other public place and sells quack medicines; a traveling quack doctor. 2. Any boastful and unscrupulous pretender; a man of trickery and buffoonery; a charlatan.
putresence is a synonym for putrid (from which it derives) which means: 1. Decomposed; especially in ad advanced stage of decomposition; rotten; also, tending to decomposition or decay; stinkingly rotten. 2. Of, pertaining to, indicating, or proceeding from, a decayed state fo organic matter; foul; as a putrid smell. 3.a. Figuratively, currupt; noisome; foul; morally vicious. b. Slang Disagreeable; displeasing.
All definitions from Webster's New International Dictionary, Second Edition 1934, 1948.
See, the perfect description of Clinton!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.