Skip to comments.
Secret Clinton Book Tapes May be Subpoenaed
NewsMax ^
| April 6, 2002
| Staff
Posted on 04/06/2002 11:35:58 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Should Judicial Watch obtain and release the Clinton-Branch audio in the meantime, the lawfirm could scoop the ex-president on his own book, thereby putting a serious damper on sales when the actual Clinton screed hits bookstores. Yeah, right. Like anyone will every buy that piece of crap other than the most devoted of Clinton sychophants.
To: Bubba_Leroy
Ha ha ha!! I read the first sentence up to the words "could become the subject of a lawsuit"-- and I knew-- Larry Klayman rustling his lawsuit papers yet AGAIN. That guy is a laugh a minute-- which is about how often he files a lawsuit. (I can tolerate him much better as a clown than a serious lawyer.)
3
posted on
04/06/2002 11:39:38 AM PST
by
Clara Lou
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
Gee thanks for the warning guys.....hey Hillary you got that bonfire going yet...man when will they learn...
Bill
To: Howlin
Here we go again.
To: ALL;Bubba_Leroy
7
posted on
04/06/2002 12:21:13 PM PST
by
Spunky
To: Bubba_Leroy
Can anyone find JW's financials on their web site? I can't. Been looking for them for years.
Why don't they openly disclose them? They have taken in at least 50 million in the last 4 to 5 years. For a "nonprofit" corp. that rants and raves and sues about disclosure they are not easily forthcoming with their own financials.
Taking a cue from JW themselves someone might ask "what is JW hiding"?
To: isthisnickcool
Here's the small print from the web site: A copy of our latest financial report may be obtained by writing to Judicial Watch at 501 School St., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20024
To: PropheticZero
Yes, the bragging is a bit much. They just need to shut up and do their job. Wanting some press is the downfall.
10
posted on
04/06/2002 12:50:08 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
To: Bubba_Leroy
As he has demonstrated on numerous occasions, Larry Klayman couldn't sue his way out of a wet paper bag.
To: isthisnickcool
Check
this out (Judicial Watch's form 990).
To: all
Or go
here and plug "judicial watch" into the search feature.
To: mountaineer
Thanks!
I'm real familiar with Guidestar and have posted links to them before. I just don't understand why JW does not post their financials on their web site. What's the big deal?
All campaign donations should be posted on the web within a couple of days (one of Bushes ideas) and the same thing should apply to nonprofits. If the nonprofits are not going to pay taxes and also benefit from the perks they receive that are subsidized by taxpayers ALL their records should be totally public.
If JW would simply publish their records (where is year 2001???) I'd be very happy. But until they do that I put them in the same league as ADL, Rainbow PUSH, PETA, The Brady Gun Grabbers, NOW, etc.
As I've said here for a long time, there are over 700,000 nonprofits in America and way too many are in business to push their political agendas and/or enrich their handlers.
To: Bubba_Leroy
It's not the people who love him...but the people who despise him, that keeps Bubba in the spotlight.
To: Howlin
"I don't recall them telling us..."Extended vacation!
To: mountaineer; isthisnickcool; deport; IwoJima; Miss Marple
Judicial Watch gained widespread media acclaim recently with a lawsuit against the Bush administration that forced the release of thousands documents related to Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force, which Democrats complained favored wealthy GOP donors from companies like Enron. Well, there you have it. After ALL those lawsuits "we" heard about, the one that gets Klayman "widespread media accliam" is the one he filed against Bush.
And where in this article does it say that most of the pages they got were blanked out??? Har.
17
posted on
04/06/2002 3:22:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Libloather
"Lindsey just slithered in," Klayman told NewsMax.com. That's real lawyerly, isn't it? Such class.
18
posted on
04/06/2002 3:24:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
"Lindsey just slithered in,"
LOL.... Yep, the "ethical Washington Watchdog" has an imagination.... Ol' Lindsey may have just as well slithered in to hand Kendall a note saying "Dinners at 7" for all the EWW knows... Or then again Lindsey may be so impressed with the lawyering skill of EWW that he couldn't resist the opportunity to see them on display... Gosh who knows so we call all speculate....
19
posted on
04/06/2002 3:51:09 PM PST
by
deport
To: Bubba_Leroy
The OIC has publicly admitted it under-investigated or dismissed outright reams of evidence against the ex-president, with former independent counsel Robert Ray revealing last month that he passed up an ironclad perjury case against Clinton. Yup,the fix was in then,and the fix is in now. Absolutely nothing real will come out of this. Bubba-1 is bulletproof.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson