Can you not deliver a cogent thought without descending to the low level of maligning your humble debating partner?
I think that the answer to what appeared, begging your pardon, to be a rather disorganized and incoherent argument is that we will go wherever the terrorists are and render them unable to harm Americans in the future.
If that means an expedition to Antarctica must be undertaken, fine, map coordinates carry no moral significance. Foreign governments who harbor organizations dedicated to the extermination of innocent women and children simply can not be tolerated. (by non liberals)
To follow your agruemnt would be to bequeathe to our children a world of sudden and horrific death as an instrument for collecting power over people's lives.
In a word, slavery and mass murder as norms in the pursuit of personal power and glory.
Argue in favor of that dark reality all you like, we do not use bullets to win arguments here as do our opponents in the war on terror. I am grateful for an opportunity to expound upon such readily accessible self evident truth.
It is my belief that there is no value in facilitating evil.
We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.
I support the war on terror, and in doing so I argue that you should not fall victim to the evil beasts who use terror and mass murder for political gain, the arafats, the bin ladens, the saddam husseins of the world must not be allowed to still your voice.
Are you unable to raise your voice similarly that I may live out my life in peace?
Get a life.