Posted on 04/04/2002 11:02:14 AM PST by wcdukenfield
For the Left, every U.S. military action they've opposed in the last quarter century was said to be the next Vietnam. We were going to be bogged down in one endless war of attrition after another — including our latest action in Afghanistan. They were wrong. However, the analogy largely works when applied to the policy the U.S. is seeking to impose on Israel today.
On September 20, 2001, in his speech before a joint session of Congress, the president set forth his doctrine for America's war on terrorism. He said that
[e]very nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime. On January 29, 2002, in his State of the Union speech, President Bush said that
[o]ur military has put the terror camps of Afghanistan out of business, yet camps still exist in at least a dozen countries. A terrorist underworld — including groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Jaish-i-Mohammed — operates in remote jungles and deserts, and hides in the centers of large cities. ... My hope is that nations will heed our call, and eliminate the terrorist parasites who threaten their countries and our own. ... But some governments will be timid in the face of terror. And make no mistake about it: If they do not act, America will.
Mr. Bush went on to describe an "axis of evil" comprised of North Korea, Iran, and Iraq.
As many have written, including me, the president's statements were Churchillian. He rallied the American people to a righteous cause with moral clarity and steely resolve. And after eight years of Clintonian dodging and word parsing, at long last we had a plain-speaking, straightforward president.
Then, on April 1, 2002, came Mr. Bush's stunning equivocation. When asked if he'd label Yasser Arafat a terrorist, the president said:
Well, Chairman Arafat has agreed to a peace process. He's agreed to the Tenet plan. He's agreed to the Mitchell plan. He has negotiated with parties as to how to achieve peace. And, of course, our hope is that he accepts the Tenet plan.
The president is right. Arafat has agreed to the Mitchell plan. He's expected to agree to the Tenet plan. He has also agreed to Oslo I and Oslo II, Hebron, and the Wye accords. Yet, nothing changes. The Israelis cede ever more territory and authority to the Palestinians in exchange for empty promises of peace. The killing of Israeli citizens has only intensified.
Mr. Bush made this statement despite the fact that during the last several weeks alone, hundreds of Israeli citizens have been murdered and injured by Palestinian suicide bombers at a Seder dinner in a hotel, Bat Mitzvah celebration, supermarket, discotheque, pizzeria, cafe, shopping mall, and on buses.
He made this statement despite the fact that Israel intercepted a 50-ton shipment of arms from Iran headed for the Palestinian Authority; terrorist groups specifically named by the president — Hamas and Hezbollah — are training and arming suicide bombers operating from areas controlled by the Palestinian Authority; and Saudi Arabia and Iraq, both of whom are Arafat allies, are paying blood money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. Two of the three nations in the "axis of evil" are direct sponsors of terrorism against Israel.
Moreover, a few days ago, the Israeli military secured documents from Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah revealing the Palestinian Authority's direct payments for explosives and other weapons used by suicide bombers. Still, Mr. Bush refuses to acknowledge that Arafat is a terrorist and that his regime perpetrates terrorist acts.
Whereas President Bush has asked the civilized world to stand with the U.S. against terrorism, Israel, which is beseiged by terrorists and their sponsors, is not receiving the administration's unqualified support. By his own words, the president has effectively rescinded the Bush Doctrine. In its stead, the White House is imposing a policy on Israel akin to America's approach to the Vietnam War.
In Vietnam, our political leaders would not allow our military to take the war to the enemy. In order to "contain" the war, enemy supply lines, staging areas, and camps in Cambodia and Laos were not targeted. In only the most exceptional circumstances were U.S. forces allowed to undertake military operations in the North. In 1973, the U.S. signed a peace treaty with the Communists, which the South Vietnamese government opposed but was forced to accept under extreme U.S. pressure. The agreement, among other things, made territorial concessions to the North and the defense of South Vietnam impossible. The Communists considered the treaty an act of surrender by America. In 1975, the South was overrun by the North.
The Bush administration, like the administration before it, has no intention of allowing Israel to defeat the terrorists who seek its destruction. The president underscored the point in his speech this morning when he insisted that Israel withdraw its troops from Palestinian areas and act quickly to accept a Palestinian state on its border.
This will neither appease nor contain the ambitions of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Authority. In fact, the message is that terrorism works when unleashed against Israel.
When Arafat rejected Ehud Barak's offer of a Palestinian state, he was speaking for all the Arab regimes that seek Israel's extinction. President Bush is offering the Palestinians what they've already rejected. Moreover, if they accept this time around, it's nothing more than another strategic step toward their ultimate goal.
The Israelis support the Bush Doctrine. The president should as well.
Big Headache. Good man. Bad Advisors.
" Bush will not label arafat a terrorist and that's a problem for me"
and
In reply to female caller saying what Bush is doing in his Middle East policy is OK and that he is better than Clinton.
Rush went on to say that no question that Bush is better than Clinton but that:
"We at some time point will have to stop comparing Bush with Clinton and we have to start comparing Bush with Bush. And in comparing Bush to Bush he is in trouble."
I Say Bush had better try and remember what his dad put us through by giving so much for a third party to work with. Of course this means you hold the Republican Party in higher esteem than your conservative values or the country.
Take YASSAR OUT-KILL HIM or whatever and the same exact problem Exists.
Nothing solved but war mongers feeling good !
The names and faces change but the problem won't go away !
If Israel's army is so good they should be able to get the job done in a few days with or without killing Yassar !
Even Bibi said this same exact thing on Fox two days ago !
BTTT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.