Posted on 04/03/2002 2:01:12 PM PST by MarkWar

Abstract: "An electromagnetic generator without moving parts includes a permanent magnet and a magnetic core including first and second magnetic paths. A first input coil and a first output coil extend around portions of the first magnetic path, while a second input coil and a second output coil extend around portions of the second magnetic path. The input coils are alternatively pulsed to provide induced current pulses in the output coils. Driving electrical current through each of the input coils reduces a level of flux from the permanent magnet within the magnet path around which the input coil extends. In an alternative embodiment of an electromagnetic generator, the magnetic core includes annular spaced-apart plates, with posts and permanent magnets extending in an alternating fashion between the plates. An output coil extends around each of these posts. Input coils extending around portions of the plates are pulsed to cause the induction of current within the output coils."
Inventors: Patrick Stephen L; Bearden Thomas E.; Hayes James C.; Moore Kenneth D.; Kenny James L.
Appl. No.: 656313
Filed: September 6, 2000
March 26, 2002 -- US Patent 6,362,718 [!!!]
And the patent was actually GIVEN!
Extracting Energy from a Permanent Magnet with Energy-Replenishing from the Active Vacuum
The Quest For Overunity, JLN Labs 1997-2002 - by Jean-Louis Naudin
I don't know if the "new FR" has handy ping lists. does anyone have handy a tin foil ping list and a strange physics ping list?
Mark W.
Mark W.
Mark W.
United States Patent 6,362,718 Motionless electromagnetic generator

SORRY!
Heck, I did a search on Thomas Bearden and nothing came up. (I see, now, that a search on "Motionless Electromagnetic" would have gotten a hit.)
My bad. Sorry, again.
Mark W.
The patent was for the magnet design. The supposed subetheric zero-point energy tap claim is not part of the patent. Have more confidence in the USPTO.
Regards,
GtG
Ah! the golden days before solid state electornics! These were the only devices that could control large currents in a low impedence environment.
I don't know why folks are poo-pooing these new ideas, while they type out messages on machines that require electrons to teleport through potential barriers they can't possibly get over according to classical theories. ;-)
So what.
Ever since the Patent Office stopped requiring working models, patents have become worthless. You can patent any insane idea. Why did they stop requiring working models? They ran out of warehouse space to store them! (I am NOT making this up).
--Boris
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.