Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld: Norwegian Pilots Needed to Protect U.S.; Military 'Run Down' by Clinton
NEWSMAX ^ | 4/3/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 04/03/2002 7:45:02 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Eight years of Clinton administration military cutbacks have left the U.S. Air Force spread so thin that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has been forced to accept help from the Norwegian Air Force to protect the country from another 9-11-style terrorist attack.

Citing the "scarcity of a number of (U.S. Air Force) assets," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced Tuesday that he and Norwegian Defense Minister Kristin Devold were in basic agreement on the unprecedented plan to have foreign pilots guard U.S. air space.

"We have offered the F-16's to the U.S., and the signal is that they might be needed," Devold said yesterday, according to the New York Daily News.

"Norway plans to be able to go together with Denmark and the Netherlands with a deployment of F-16's if we are needed later this year," the female defense chief added.

The Norwegian pilots would have the same authority as U.S. pilots to shoot down commercial airliners that posed a terrorist threat.

Rumsfeld called Devold's offer "a very important thing" before noting that USAF assets were "scarce."

In January, the Bush defense secretary decried defense cutbacks during the Clinton era, saying they had left U.S. defenses "run-down."

"The infrastructure had decayed and it is still decayed and it will take now probably six, eight, ten years to get it back to the place that it ought to be," he told NBC's "Meet the Press."

"It takes time to run-down a great military and it takes time to build one back up," he added. (See: Rumsfeld Slams Clinton Military Cutbacks)

The Pentagon announced last month that round-the-clock sorties over cities like New York and Washington, the targets of the worst terrorist attack in world history, put too much stress on planes and pilots alike and were simply too expensive to maintain.

After initial reports that the overflights were to be discontinued altogether, Rumsfeld said that planes would still fly but at diminished frequency.

Tuesday's announcement that the Pentagon plans to turn to Norwegian pilots to protect U.S. air space appears to be the result of the post 9-11 demands on the U.S. military, where the existing number U.S. F-16's are no longer able to handle both homeland defense and the war in Afghanistan.

During the 1990s, the Clinton-Gore administration focused most of its budget balancing efforts on the U.S. military, with Pentagon brass complaining by the end of the decade that the cutbacks had left American forces unable to fight two major military conflicts simultaneously.

Across the board cuts crippled troop morale and devastated reenlistment, with military experts warning that force readiness had dropped to its lowest levels since the days of President Jimmy Carter's "hollow military."

The Navy's stockpile of cruise missiles was largely depleted when Clinton used them in 1998 to distract the American people from the Monica Lewinsky scandal with attacks on an empty al-Qaeda encampment in Afghanistan and a Sudanese medical facility.

Air Force cruise missile stockpiles took a similar hit when Clinton decided to go to war in Kosovo in the wake of his impeachment.

The Royal Norwegian Air Force has 58 U.S.-made F-16's.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: clintonmilitary

1 posted on 04/03/2002 7:45:02 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I beat you to it. The story was first posted here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/658770/posts
2 posted on 04/03/2002 7:47:09 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"...attacks on an empty al-Qaeda encampment in Afghanistan and a Sudanese medical facility."

Actually, it was in Kosovo that Clinton threw all these missiles away.

3 posted on 04/03/2002 7:51:07 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
VP Cheney was appalled, a month after taking office, to find that the military budget had been raided. No one can find out where the money went. Gee, do you think.....?
4 posted on 04/03/2002 8:31:14 AM PST by steenkeenbadges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't he just rip into two military officers who said that the forces were tired and over extended? Maybe the administration needs to pull out of some commitments before putting us into still more?
5 posted on 04/03/2002 8:35:29 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Navy's stockpile of cruise missiles was largely depleted when Clinton used them in 1998 to distract the American people from the Monica Lewinsky scandal with attacks on an empty al-Qaeda encampment in Afghanistan and a Sudanese medical facility.

While I'm no Clinton apologist and do indeed fault him for the military draw down and diminishing morale, one would be hard pressed not to find the above statement to be intellectually dishonest.

7 posted on 04/03/2002 8:54:40 AM PST by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HockeyPop
Why do you find it intellectually dishonest? Please elaborate...
8 posted on 04/03/2002 9:04:35 AM PST by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven
The author suggests that Clinton depleted our stockpiles of cruise missliles in going after bin Laden. The truth is he didn't use enough and it can be hardly said that using 6-12 missiles caused any major draw down in stocks. Clinton refused to put terrorism front and center on the national agenda. He refused to maintain a standing army at the levels necessary. He gave away nuclear technology to the North Koreans. He gutted intelligence. I could go on, but to say that firing a few missiles caused any appreciable diminishment in assets ignores the truth.
9 posted on 04/03/2002 9:44:10 AM PST by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson