Skip to comments.
US Allies Quietly Concerned Over Split In Bush Administration
Defense and Foreign Affairs Daily
| April 2, 2002
| Gregory R. Copley
Posted on 04/03/2002 7:21:52 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Stand Watch Listen
This has been exacerbated by reports that Secretary Powell has been actively considering pursuing the Democratic Party nomination for the US Presidency in the 2004 election, with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as his running mate. Sounds like a bunch of baloney to me.
To: Stand Watch Listen
The only honorable thing for Powel to do (if this is the case) is to resign or (if not true) refute it.
3
posted on
04/03/2002 7:24:51 AM PST
by
IncPen
To: Stand Watch Listen
Powell has been actively considering pursuing the Democratic Party nomination for the US Presidency in the 2004 election, with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as his running mateA LOSING TICKET
4
posted on
04/03/2002 7:26:28 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: Stand Watch Listen
Interesting propaganda.Did it originate from the DNC???
5
posted on
04/03/2002 7:27:10 AM PST
by
habs4ever
To: Stand Watch Listen
This has been exacerbated by reports that Secretary Powell has been actively considering pursuing the Democratic Party nomination for the US Presidency in the 2004 election, with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as his running mate.(.... BS
6
posted on
04/03/2002 7:27:22 AM PST
by
finnman69
To: Stand Watch Listen
"This has been exacerbated by reports that Secretary Powell has been actively considering pursuing the Democratic Party nomination for the US Presidency in the 2004 election, with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as his running mate."
Maybe the stupidest think I've heard in months. Verrrry unlikely.
To: IncPen
or (if not true) refute it You do not want to get caught in that trap (i.e., refuting every absurd rumor that somebody tries to float). Otherwise you spend all your time denying rumors, and then if you fail to deny a rumor that is taken as evidence that it is true.
8
posted on
04/03/2002 7:28:43 AM PST
by
dpwiener
To: Stand Watch Listen
Powell/sinator hillary! 2004 - gimme a break!
9
posted on
04/03/2002 7:29:59 AM PST
by
mombonn
To: Stand Watch Listen
Ha ha ha. Powell would have been handed the GOP party nomination if he had wanted it. This rumor is so stupid.
10
posted on
04/03/2002 7:31:17 AM PST
by
jlogajan
To: Stand Watch Listen
Bush should get rid of him. The sooner the better. If he's president today, he'd probably offer to negotiate peace with bin Laden and all the Arab terrorist states.
11
posted on
04/03/2002 7:35:23 AM PST
by
JudgeMan
To: Stand Watch Listen
This article appears to be horsehockey.
To: Stand Watch Listen
Not surprisingly, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Yasir Arafat appealed to Secretary of State Powell on April 1, 2002, to help raise the Israeli siege of his compound in Ramallah. It was clear that Arafat, and those Arab leaders supporting him, placed their hopes in Powell, rather than anyone else in the Bush Administration What an Idiot. Do they think that Powell would agree to anything that went contrary to the position of the man he works for and supposedly represents?
To: Stand Watch Listen
(....hmmmm..anyone else heard of this?So ridiculous it's not even worth repeating.
14
posted on
04/03/2002 7:45:16 AM PST
by
paul51
To: jlogajan
Has everyone missed the importance of this piece? The Powell/Hillery cr**p has distracted the discussion from the very real problem Powell has created by running in a different direction than Bush. He has split the administration (at least in the eyes of adversaries and some allies.) And as a result we now have "exception" policies for the Middle East. If the administation thinks that the Middle East is the only complicated region in the world and that by treating it differently they will overcome the problem they are sadly mistaken. There will be a whole host of new regions where "exception" policy will now be trumpeted by policy makers who don't understand the real nature of the threat against us. And by foes who will manipulate the State Department into adopting "exception policy" for which ever region they don't want the U.S. and her allies to tackle. And speaking of allies, when we expect Israel to back us 100% but are unwilling to do the same - what kind of message does that send to others we count on? We run the risk of becoming a oneway ally and in the process we may find that there aren't too many out there who will put their a** on the line come crunch time feeling that we won't be there for them. I don't like Hillery any more than any of you. But, I know enough about the situation we are in to not make a Powell/Hillary debate any part of my day. Not now at least.
15
posted on
04/03/2002 7:47:23 AM PST
by
tripod
To: Stand Watch Listen
Sec. Powell remains overwhelmingly popular with the US electorate Only with the left wing liberals and it is hype to reference the electorate in general. Powell needs to get on board with Bush or get out. If the gov's speculation is accurate about more terrorist attacks on the US, and as Arafat's suicidal minions continue to kill Isralis, only makes Powel's placating foolishness painfully apparent. It will most certainly result in Powel's politacl ruin. Presidentail hopeful?? Hillary's Colin, what a ticket that would be.
To: Stand Watch Listen
One error in this senario:
Hillary would never be second-fiddle (again). Being First Lady was her last "second-fiddle" position. She would not be a VP candidate on any ticket. She'd expect top billing only. If she decides to stay in the Senate, she'll be after Shumer--get him out so he can be "senior Senator."
17
posted on
04/03/2002 7:51:43 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Stand Watch Listen
Here is a link to the International Strategic Studies Association, which (I think) publishes
Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily.
They're reputable-seeming, but their various web pages are notably sparse, and this type of rumor-monging seems outside their stated area of knowledge.
Sounds like disinformation to me.
18
posted on
04/03/2002 7:52:16 AM PST
by
r9etb
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Republican Wildcat
LOL! I'm glad that was at the beginning of the article. I would hate to have read the whole thing only to find out it was a bunch of crap at the end!
20
posted on
04/03/2002 7:59:22 AM PST
by
TheDon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson