Posted on 04/02/2002 2:33:35 AM PST by kattracks
(CNSNews.com) - A leading pro-family organization is questioning attempts by a Suburban Washington, D.C. lesbian couple to deliberately create a deaf child.
Candy McCullough and Sharon Duchesneau of North Bethesda, Md. said they did everything possible to make sure their newborn son is deaf by specifically seeking and obtaining a sperm donor for artificial insemination who has a lengthy family history of deafness.
But one group has made it clear it disagrees with the women's choice to produce children with disabilities, not to mention raising them in a homosexual household.
"This couple has effectively decided that their desire to have a deaf child is of more concern to them than is the burden they are placing on their son," Ken Connor, president of the Family Research Council, said.
"To intentionally give a child a disability, in addition to all the disadvantages that come as a result of being raised in a homosexual household, is incredibly selfish," Connor said.
McCullough and Duchesneau, who were featured in a cover story of the Washington Post Magazine March 31, already have a daughter who was designed to be deaf and they're hoping their son Gauvin is deaf as well. Duchesneau is the mother of both children.
Because the child is a newborn infant, it will take several months until an audiologist can determine whether Gauvin can or cannot hear.
The women, however, insisted that it is not of utmost important that Gauvin is deaf, but they would like their son to have the same disability as the rest of the family.
Duchesneau hopes the family's deafness stays intact. "He'd be the only hearing member of the family. Other than the cats," she told the Washington Post Magazine.
McCullough was more direct in her hopes that their son would be deaf. "I would say that we wanted to increase our chances of having a baby who is deaf," she said in an interview with the Post.
But Connor said it was wrong to attempt to produce a deaf child and that serious challenges against the traditional definition of family were taking place.
"This reduces the father to a mere inseminator, raises the prospects of donor shopping and designer genes, and turns a baby into a trophy," Connor said.
An official with the Family Research Council said the group's opposition to deliberately creating deaf children would not change if the couple were heterosexual.
McCullough told the Post that families should have the right to seek sperm donors from anyone in order to be comfortable with the culture of the family.
"Some people look at it like, 'Oh my gosh, you shouldn't have a child who has a disability'. But, you know, black people have harder lives. Why shouldn't parents be able to go ahead and pick a black donor if that's what they want," McCullough asked rhetorically.
\sb100\sa100"They should have that option. They can feel related to that culture, bonded with that culture," McCullough said.
But Connor disagrees when it comes to deliberately trying to create children with the burdens of physical disabilities.
"We've seen many parents try to ensure they create children possessing a certain trait, however, this couple has sought to create a child so that he does not possess a certain trait - in this case, the ability to hear," Connor said.
\sb100\sa100
"One can only hope that this practice of intentionally manufacturing disabled children in order to fit the lifestyles of the parents will not progress any further," Connor said.
The women were quick to point out that they would not be disappointed if Gauvin could hear but were just as clear in telling the Post that they preferred him to be deaf.
"A hearing baby would be a blessing," Duchesneau said. "A deaf baby would be a special blessing."
Connor hopes the practice of designing babies is stopped. "The places this slippery slope could lead are frightening," he said.
E-mail a news tip to Matt Pyeatt.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
This is sickening.
This is the end of sanity as we know it.
Freaks
I guess this means they will do everything in their power to see that their child is gay too.
ROFL. A intentionally deaf child raised by intentionally lesbian parents becomes "a trophy".
People who have disabled children will know the special nature of these children as blessings in ways that others will never know. I know, I had one who died at 2 1/2 years of age. But I would never wish what he had on anyone much less intentionally try to recreate it if I could. For this "couple" having this child is not about the child, it is about them and their need to flaunt their lifestyle by going even further over the edge by hoping to include a disability. The only thing that would make the story more complete is if they wanted this child to be a professional musician.
Uhhmm, no. What people are saying is “You shouldn’t TRY to give your child a disability.”
Hey, good luck explaining your selfish, warped decision to the kids when they’re 18. Maybe you can screw them up to the point where their happy to be disabled, but I’d bet against it…
Owl _ Eagle
“Guns before butter.”
Go read the article. It would be inspiring if they were deliberately seeking to adopt a deaf kid, knowing that they would be better suited to care for him.
But these selfish lesbos are creating a deaf person on purpose. That's sick.
There are multiple ethical and moral issues here, namely, artificial insemination, purposeful creation of a physical defect for an undetermined purpose, and lesbian parents. I can't see this as a romantic attempt to believe in the sanctity of life. In my opinion, it is motivated by something much darker than that.
Am I crazy or does this comment make blackness sound like a disability? Not very PC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.