Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: agent4cia
REd mercury hot fusion is much more plausible than cold fusion that many believe in at FR. Why? Because the former might be less flattering of our own lifestyles, while the latter is much more flattering to believe in.

Cold fusion hoax vs. Red Mercury scare. I take the latter.

3 posted on 04/02/2002 1:57:03 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: lavaroise
REd mercury hot fusion is much more plausible than cold fusion that many believe in at FR. Why?

Because we know enough about cold fusion to debunk it, whereas we know nothing about Red Mercury, so we ascribe to it whatever properties we as individuals think plausible.

While I expect that there is a substance called "Red Mercury" that the Russians have used in the making of nuclear weapons, I doubt that such a magic explosive exists as described. Our spies in Moscow were not completely incompetent throughout the entire cold war. If such a thing existed, we'd probably have obtained knowledge of it, and would be employing it in our conventional ordnance. A super chemical explosive has implications that go far beyond improved nuclear weapons.

30 posted on 04/04/2002 7:39:41 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson